Parallel Universe

FEATURED POST

The best sci-fi movies (so far) of the 2000s

By Parallel Universe on MSN Sep 13, 2012 10:45AM

'Minority Report'/DreamWorks

By Don Kaye
Special to MSN Movies

 

We’ve spoken before in this space about the past decade or so gradually ushering in a new Golden Age of science fiction cinema, and we keep getting more and more evidence of that: For example, two of the biggest films at the Toronto International Film Festival this week are “Looper” and “Cloud Atlas,” one acclaimed as a mind-bending thriller and the other hailed as a visionary epic, and both standing tall at that festival amid the customary festival fare and Oscar bait.

 

Bing: More about 'Minority Report' | More about Tom Cruise

 

Appropriately, since the start of the new millennium, we’ve seen movies that aim for – even if they don’t always reach – the standard set by Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey.” Yes, there's still plenty of dross like the “Transformers” junkers and nonsense like “Battleship.” But we’re more than happy with the good stuff that has come across the screen in the past 12 years. Can “Looper,” “Cloud Atlas” or “The Hunger Games” join our lofty list? Check it out (so far) and see:

 

“Minority Report” (2002): Steven Spielberg adapts Philip K. Dick’s story about crimes of the future – and the people who predict them – with stunning visuals and a complex story, while Tom Cruise gives one of his better performances of recent vintage. The only wrong note is that the story ends – and the movie goes on for another 15 minutes.

 

“Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: (2004): Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet meet on a train, but it soon becomes apparent they’ve done this before. Michel Gondry’s beautiful, surreal and poignant fable of memory and love lost and regained shows how wide the sci-fi genre can stretch.

 

“Serenity”(2005): Joss Whedon’s sole previous feature film before “The Avengers” showcased his dexterity with character, dialogue and action, all set against a detailed future universe and intergalactic political conspiracy. You don’t even have to know the TV series (“Firefly”) to enjoy it.

 

“War of the Worlds” (2005): Spielberg brings us the most faithful and terrifying version of the H.G. Wells classic yet. The faults in the story (like the cause of the aliens’ eventual defeat) mostly belong to Wells, too, but they’re overshadowed by the director’s frightening invasion sequences as a metaphor for post-9/11 paranoia.

 

“The Fountain” (2006): This overlooked gem from Darren Aronofsky (“Black Swan”) spans 1,000 years of time as it tells three parallel narratives about love, consciousness and the nature of reality. It may well be the spiritual predecessor to the Wachowskis’ “Cloud Atlas.”

 

“Children of Men” (2006): The horror of director Alfonso Cuaron’s grim tale – in which humankind is inexplicably unable to procreate anymore – is the accumulation of details that paint a portrait of a dark future not too far removed from our own present. A moving, almost unbearably intense masterpiece.

 

“Sunshine” (2007): This underrated favorite of ours, this time from “Slumdog Millionaire” director Danny Boyle, puts a small space crew on an almost certainly doomed journey to reignite the sun and save the Earth. Gripping, chilling and occasionally visionary, “Sunshine” is a film waiting to be rediscovered and savored.

 

“Moon” (2009): Duncan Jones’ debut feature is a throwback to the '70s, with claustrophobic sets and atmosphere getting the job done instead of visual razzle-dazzle, anchored by a tremendous performance from Sam Rockwell as an astronaut and his clone – who both want to live.

 

“Star Trek (2009): It’s far from perfect, but J.J. Abrams’ reboot of the classic series was a shot in the arm for the worn-out franchise. The director and his team revitalized the central concept and characters while paying respect to what had come before, a delicate juggling act that he mostly managed to pull off.

 

“District 9” (2009): It’s still hard to believe that this confident, focused film was the first feature from director-writer Neill Blomkamp, since it’s very close to a masterpiece. A brilliant commentary on South Africa’s long, painful struggles with race, it’s also a satisfying, gory action thriller and a moving character piece where the most sympathetic character is not human.

 

“Avatar” (2009): It almost didn’t make the list because it retells the hoary and vaguely insulting “white man comes to save the natives” story one more time, but for the creation of a wholly new world and the level of technical innovation it introduced, “Avatar” still shines.

 

“Monsters” (2010): This little indie gem tells a big story on an intimate canvas as two people make their way across a Mexico crawling with extraterrestrial life – and it’s starting to spill over the border. The current-events subtext is well-handled, while the story has its moments of sheer terror and even profundity.

 

“Sound of My Voice” (2012): Is cult leader Maggie (Brit Marling, who also co-wrote) really from the future or just another scam artist? That’s the central question of this tiny mood piece, which examines just how far people will go for their beliefs.

 

Joss Whedon giving Asgardian bad guy the day off

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse 7 hours ago
Marvel
We won't have Loki to kick around (or, if you're the Hulk, pound into the floor) anymore. That's according to writer/director Joss Whedon, who says that the Asgardian trickster and adopted brother of Thor won't appear in "The Avengers 2."


Whedon revealed the news during an interview with the Empire Movie Podcast (via Screencrush) while promoting his latest film, "Much Ado About Nothing." Asked what role Loki -- as played by Tom Hiddleston -- might have in the upcoming "Avengers" sequel, Whedon said, "Imitating what I did before is the surest way to do it not as well...and Loki is not there to say those terrible things."

That's fair. Even though Loki actually turned out to be the best villain so far in the Marvel Cinematic Universe -- thanks in no small part to Hiddleston's excellent performances -- he was the main nemesis in "Thor" and "The Avengers" and will be part of "Thor: The Dark World" this November. The guy deserves a break from doing all that evil after three movies, don't you think?

Of course, Whedon has not said who the main villain in "The Avengers 2" will be, although it's widely expected to be the death-dealing superbeing Thanos. All Whedon would say about the status of "The Avengers 2" to Empire was, "I've turned in a first draft, but the story is very set. Everybody's very much on board with the exact movie I'm trying to make which is what worked the first time."

So there you have it -- no Loki in "The Avengers 2." Does that mean he'll meet his end in "Thor: The Dark World"? Do you want more Loki in Marvel's upcoming films? Tell us what you think at at MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.

"The Avengers 2" is out in theaters Friday, May 1, 2015.

 

We talk with star Katharine Isabelle about feminist horror

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse 10 hours ago
IndsutryWorks
In "American Mary," Katharine Isabelle plays the title character, a broke, desperate medical student who tries getting a job at a strip club to pay her bills. She doesn't get that gig, but is instead introduced to the world of underground body modification surgery -- which she becomes quite successful at. Successful enough, in fact, that when one of her former professors drugs and rapes her at a party, she uses her connections to have him kidnapped and brought to her place -- where she practices her surgical techniques on him with a notable lack of anesthesia.


"American Mary" is the brainchild of "The Twisted Twins" writing-directing sisters Sylvia and Jen Soska, who made their debut in 2009 with "Dead Hooker in a Trunk." Despite that and the new movie's lurid subject matter, "American Mary" is character-based, with the charismatic Isabelle holding the screen at all times and making Mary into an edgy and oddly charming anti-hero besieged on all sides by men who want something from her.

Of course, Isabelle did the very same thing 13 years ago in "Ginger Snaps," in which she and Emily Perkins played sisters and high school outsiders whose lives are changed forever when Isabelle's Ginger is bitten by a werewolf. Smart, funny and a subversion of the usual clichéd portrayal of women in horror, "Ginger Snaps" has become a cult favorite since its release, while Isabelle has amassed a solid array of film and TV credits that include a recent stint on Syfy's American version of "Being Human." But she shines like a scalpel in "American Mary," and took some time out to chat with us via phone about that movie and more.

MSN Movies: What drew you to this story and to this character?

Katharine Isabelle: Well, I was sent the script and I was just going to sort of briefly scan through it, and I ended up reading the whole 180 pages on my BlackBerry, which, I guess, is my first clue that this was an intriguing film. It was intriguing to me, anyway. And then I had to send it to a couple of people and just get it checked to make sure I wasn't completely insane, because I really loved it. I really loved the character Mary because, I mean, she's so unique as far as the women in film and it's actually where movies go. I like the fact that she has no real redeeming qualities and yet you still really like her at the end of the day. She's interesting, she's smart, she's funny and she's a bit of a weirdo.

And then when I met the twins, Jen and Sylvia Soska, we became instant best friends and that was it for me. It took another nine months or so to actually get the movie made, but I knew I wanted in right away. I never know really why. I liked it and thought maybe there are other weird people out there who would like it.

Did you say 180 pages?

Yeah, there's a lot of black on the page. They write in this manner that is so descriptive that it really colors your imagination when you're reading it. They talk about the music and the shots and everything, yeah.

How did you find the way to make Mary likable, or at least someone that the audience wants to stay engaged with?

I think we all have our days and moments where we're not particularly likable and outgoing, and I think tapping into that probably isn't all that hard. I don't really know what we did. I really just didn't want to let down the girls or let down the character of Mary that I loved so much, and they were very, very supportive and encouraging and generous with the character ... the character of Mary is based quite a lot on (Sylvia). So I just kind of followed her around and observed what she did, and used my instincts to try to portray a character that was so interesting to me.

Mary, like Ginger, is besieged by men yet ends up becoming a much-empowered character. What has it meant to you to play these kinds of really powerful female characters in a genre that is very clearly not known for them?

I'm pleased as punch to have that. As a woman in film -- and I've been doing this for 26 years -- you want to portray to other women in the world a strong character, and the fact that it's in a genre such as horror ... I think it gives relief to myself and to other women to see characters who don't put up with the bulls---, who don't acquiesce, who don't smile and make nice-nice and are still likable. And are strong.

Is there something different about a film like this being directed by a woman or, in this case, two women?

I think so. I mean, I don't know when you watch a movie whether it should matter -- whether you should know who directed it, you know, gender-wise. I think that can definitely put a spin on what you think of the filmmaker's intention or vision. I think that as women, as the twins are, they have a deeper understanding of what it's like to be objectified and marginalized than maybe if a guy had directed the movie. And the comfort level, you know, for me on set was more so than it probably would have been if there was a guy directing.

What was it like to work with two directors on a purely technical level? Did they divide up their duties?

They're a very cohesive team and they both know exactly what they want at the end of the day. So if you have any questions, as long as you can find one of them, your question's going to be answered correctly and unanimously. Sylvia's the why and Jen is the how. Sylvia's the more emotional, creative one and Jen is the one who's like, "Listen, this is how we're gonna get this s--- done today."

I read that they actually wrote the part with you in mind. Were you aware of that when you read the script, or did they tell you afterwards?


I did not know until I met them afterwards. That's always a scary thing to do, write a script for somebody that you don't know, because I could be totally not what their preconceived notions of me might have been. That's scary. We could have totally not gotten along and whatever. But thankfully we were meant to be together forever and they're never allowed to do anything without me ever again.

How comfortable are you with the makeup and gore effects at this point?


It's great if it doesn't have to be on me. I'm very comfortable with it happening to other people. There are people who love getting prosthetics done. I don't particularly enjoy it, but the blood is always fun, and then you just really need a bath after or a hot shower. It gets sticky and awful. But I was happy that for the most part I was the one with really high heels and not six hours of prosthetics on the face.

What was your interaction with the body modification culture, and what insight did you get into them?


We had Russ Foxx and Elwood Reid from the Church of Body Modification come on and mentor us and help us and really support us. I mean, the reason they were into supporting this film is we treat this culture with respect. We don't point fingers and "freak show" them. That's something that they're quite used to. They would come to me with everything I needed to know, all the procedures I needed to know, all of the before-and-after pictures I needed to see and Russ would explain everything to me, show me a few things that I needed to know. In that way I was exposed to the body modification world in a knowledgeable, respectful fashion instead of just sort of going to the Internet finding weird, creepy stuff.

I've actually seen "Ginger Snaps" on cable now twice in the past week. After 13 years, what are your thoughts on that film and how it has endured?


We didn't know when we were making it what we were doing. Emily and I auditioned for it, we thought it was really cool, but when you're making a teenage werewolf movie about menstruation in the woods in Canada in 1999, before werewolves and vampires and all that were so popular, we were like, "This could be really good, hopefully, or it could be really bad and people will never work again." We didn't know. Fortunately, it turned out really well, but it went to film festivals and some critics liked it and then that was kind of that.

It was about two years later that I realized it had gained this little cult following and was a popular movie. To this day I still get, like, 12-year-olds -- people who weren't even born when we made that movie -- coming up to me and talking about it. It's endured this long, I think, because it was, again, so unique. It was a strong female character who didn't put up with, you know -- we would all like to kick ass like that. But instead we have to smile and act pretty and be nice to people we don't necessarily want to be nice to all the time. It was smart and it was funny, it was interesting, it was original. And I think that's why "American Mary" is getting the same reaction now.

What's next?

I just finished a movie in Toronto called "Torment" and am going back for some stuff on "Being Human," and continuing my life as the homeless, traveling gypsy filmmaker. The great adventure that is the unknown.

"American Mary" is out on Blu-ray and DVD now.

For more on movies, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.


Across the Universe is a weekly 5-part column written by Don Kaye. Follow him on Twitter @donkaye.


Xlrator

 

Plus, 'Lifeforce' and 'The Howling' arrive on Blu-ray

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse 10 hours ago
Criterion - Scream Factory
This Tuesday's Blu-ray bounty includes a landmark of early science fiction cinema, one of the great bad movies of all time, and a horror film known for its pioneering special effects.


First is "Things to Come," the 1936 film based on H.G. Wells' book "The Shape of Things to Come." Wells, best known for classic works of sci-fi like "The Time Machine" and "The War of the Worlds," was heavily involved with the film, writing the screenplay and often clashing with producer Alexander Korda and director William Cameron Menzies, a genius of production design getting behind the camera for the first time. Wells' book was not a novel, but more a treatise on how he saw the future playing out, with some of it -- like his prediction of what ended up being World War II -- eerie in its foresight.
Criterion
The movie itself is a mixed bag, although it stands alongside "Metropolis" (1927) as one of the first true sci-fi spectacles (ironically, Wells hated "Metropolis"). The loosely plotted narrative follows first John Cabal and then his grandson Oswald (both played by Raymond Massey) across 100 years of history, from an apocalyptic war that lasts 30 years and levels civilization to the eventual restoration of society and technological progress, ending with the first space flight. The movie is heavy-handed and preachy, with almost nonexistent characterizations, but it's also beautifully designed, ambitious and occasionally visionary.

It's also required viewing for students of sci-fi cinema. Luckily, Criterion has made it a real pleasure to look at after years of dull, aged video transfers. Large swaths of the movie look amazingly pristine. The image makes it easier to appreciate some of the striking compositions and camerawork that Menzies pulled off, adding to its intermittent power. "Things to Come" may be deeply flawed as storytelling, but admirable for its scope and aspirations. The disc comes with an excellent commentary from film historian David Kalat, plus new features on the designs, special effects and score (which was the first movie soundtrack ever released on vinyl).


In 1976, British author Colin Wilson published "The Space Vampires," in which an Earth spaceship discovers and accidentally lets loose three humanoid beings from a derelict alien craft who proceed to drain the energy from all humans they come in contact with. Cannon Films, known for low-budget genre fare, ponied up $25 million and hired director Tobe Hooper ("The Texas Chain Saw Massacre," "Poltergeist") to make the book into sci-fi/horror blockbuster.

The result, "Lifeforce," is one of those classic bad movies that is fun to watch under certain conditions (and perhaps with certain beverages as accompaniment). It's even better to look at now since Scream Factory has given the film its long-awaited Blu-ray debut, releasing both the international 116-minute cut and the U.S. 101-minute cut on one disc. The longer cut (which also restores Henry Mancini's full score) does help with plot points rendered confusing or incoherent in the U.S. version. It's a better movie as a result.

It is still, however, absolutely nuts, starting with the discovery of a gigantic alien vessel hidden in Halley's Comet and ending with a plague of zombies overrunning a devastated London in what often plays like a mashup of every British sci-fi movie ever made and then some. Some of the ideas are audacious (like the concept that the aliens are the actual basis of vampire mythology), while the special effects range from unusual to ludicrous and long chunks of the movie consist of men standing around in offices until some new bizarre horror erupts.
Scream Factory
And then there's Mathilda May, the stunning French actress who plays the lead vampire and walks around fully nude for the first half of the movie. Her performance remains perhaps the single thing fans remember most, and it's telling that her retrospective interview in the bonus features is nearly twice as long as that of Hooper or star Steve Railsback. Speaking of Railsback, the poor man gives one of the most awful performances we've ever seen, but in fairness, his Col. Tom Carlsen just spends most of the movie obsessed with Mathilda.

The retrospective interviews are fun, while Hooper provides a number of great memories in his hosted commentary track (he seems to have really enjoyed making the movie despite its reputation). He also personally oversaw its restoration for Blu-ray, making this the most color-saturated and striking version ever issued. "Lifeforce" is a hoot, compulsively watchable despite its many problems, and a must for fans of Hooper and '80s sci-fi.


Anyone who watched "The Howling" in a movie theater when it was released in April 1981 vividly recalls the movie's "holy crap" moment, a centerpiece transformation of serial killer Eddie Quist (Robert Picardo, who later played the holographic doctor on "Star Trek: Voyager") into a werewolf. Lycanthropes had not featured much on the big screen for decades before this (except for Paul Naschy's Spanish horror films, which were difficult to see in the U.S.), but the groundbreaking makeup effects by Rob Bottin (who next worked on John Carpenter's "The Thing") brought this classic monster back in a big way and ushered in a new era of creature creations -- as did the equally pioneering "An American Werewolf in London," released just four months later.

"The Howling," directed by Joe Dante ("Gremlins") and written by John Sayles, was based on a straightforward horror novel by Gary Brandner. Little remains of Brandner's book in Dante and Sayles' more satirical take, which sends up the media, psychotherapy, New Age communes and the horror genre itself while still delivering the gruesome, macabre fun. Dee Wallace ("E.T.") plays Karen, a news anchor traumatized by an encounter with Eddie. Her therapist (Patrick Macnee) suggests that she and her husband (the late Christopher Stone, Wallace's real-life spouse) head to his secluded beach retreat, the Colony -- which is in fact a front for a den of werewolves.
Scream Factory
There are numerous references to other werewolf movies throughout the film, as well as cameos from genre names like John Carradine, Kenneth Tobey, Forrest J Ackerman, Dick Miller and Roger Corman, indicating that Dante is not taking the proceedings too seriously. He is respectful of the genre, however, and "The Howling" is often as scary as it is funny. Its wittiness combines with the authentic shock of the transformations to make it a template for future horror comedies.

"The Howling" has been released on Blu-ray abroad but not here until now, and the new disc offers up a sharper and more colorful transfer than the previous DVD editions (although it's still a little "soft" in that '80s way). The remixed digital surround sound is also fun, especially during the transformation sequences. The disc is packed with bonus features, including the 48-minute "Unleashing the Beast" documentary; separate interviews with executive producer Steven Lane, editor Mark Goldblatt and others; a look at the film's locations; a vintage featurette from the time of production; deleted scenes; an older commentary with Dante, Wallace, Stone and Picardo, and a new one with the now-80-year-old Brandner.

"Things to Come," "Lifeforce" and "The Howling" are all out on Blu-ray/DVD now.

For more on movies, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.


Across the Universe is a weekly 5-part column written by Don Kaye. Follow him on Twitter @donkaye.

 

We doubt it, but here's what could be in store for Superman

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse 11 hours ago
Warner Bros. Pictures
Now that "Man of Steel" is a proven hit, with $125 million alone at the U.S. box office in its opening weekend, it's safe to say that "Man of Steel 2" is coming. But when?


The Wall Street Journal reported rather optimistically today that a second Superman adventure could arrive onscreen as early as 2014. Next year? We're going to say right here that we find that highly unlikely.

While Warner Bros. is absolutely going ahead with a sequel to "Man of Steel," and has locked down director Zack Snyder and writer David S. Goyer to return, Goyer has not even written a script yet. And even if he already had one whipped up, a picture like "Man of Steel" requires not just an enormous amount of time to actually shoot, but an equally long (or even longer) post-production period.

Put it this way: Parallel Universe visited the set of "Man of Steel" in August 2011 -- almost a full two years before the movie opened in theaters. Much of that time after shooting ended was spent on the massive amount of visual effects that went into the picture. Think all that -- writing, pre-production, shooting, post-production -- could get done in time for, let's say, a Christmas 2014 release?

Actually, you might be able to do it. But you'd have a rushed job, and we'd like to think that the studio would want Snyder, Goyer and everyone involved to lavish the same care on the second film as they did on the first one.

No, we think a summer 2015 release date is much more likely, and even that is fairly tight, but much more reasonable than next year.

The next question is, of course, what will "Man of Steel 2" be about? Slight spoilers ahead, folks, so beware if you haven't seen "Man of Steel" yet.

According to Bleeding Cool, Snyder and Goyer are already talking about taking Superman global -- meaning that his actions will have ramifications outside the U.S. (where the first film is mainly focused). There is also the Luthor factor -- with the LexCorp logo displayed in at least two scenes in "Man of Steel," it's a certainty that arch-nemesis Lex Luthor is lurking out there.


And then there's the larger DC Universe and the "Justice League" film, which Warner Bros. wants to make badly (and which we expect to see in 2016 or 2017). Goyer has revealed in various interviews (rounded up by Slashfilm) that there are also references to Wayne Enterprises, S.T.A.R. Labs and Blaze Comics in "Man of Steel" -- organizations connected with DC heroes Batman, Cyborg and Booster Gold respectively. Then there's the mysterious empty Kryptonian spacepod that Superman finds in the Fortress of Solitude -- who was in it and where did the occupant go? (Hint: it could be a "she.")

Lots to ponder here, including whether "Man of Steel" has the staying power to join the billion-dollar superhero club at the box office (charter members: Batman, Iron Man and the Avengers). The coming weeks should reveal more.

In the meantime, should the studio rush out a new Superman movie for 2014? Where do you think the character can go from here, and with what villains/allies? Tell us at MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.

"Man of Steel" is out in theaters now.

 

Third and fourth films in rebooted franchise confirmed

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse 12 hours ago
Sony Pictures
Wow. The powers-that-be at Columbia Pictures must be feeling very good about the prospects for "The Amazing Spider-Man 2," since they've set release dates for not just a third entry, but a fourth one as well!


"The Amazing Spider-Man 2" is still in production and not out for another 11 months, but Columbia (and its parent company, Sony) have announced that "The Amazing Spider-Man 3" will be out on June 10, 2016 and "The Amazing Spider-Man 4" will reach theaters on May 4, 2018.

Jeff Blake, Sony Pictures Chairman of Worldwide Marketing and Distribution, said in a press release, "Spider-Man is our most important, most successful, and most beloved franchise, so we're thrilled that we are in a position to lock in these prime release dates over the next five years."

What's interesting about this is that 2012's "The Amazing Spider-Man," which rebooted the franchise with Marc Webb directing and Andrew Garfield playing the title character, grossed less money worldwide than the three previous "Spider-Man" movies from director Sam Raimi and star Tobey Maguire. Now, to be sure, "The Amazing Spider-Man" did rake in a very healthy $752 million globally -- although it's the only Spidey adventure to not crack $300 million in the U.S. (it made $262 million).

Nevertheless, the studio must like what they're seeing from the set of the new film, which finds Webb and Garfield returning, along with Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy. The villain-heavy cast also includes Jamie Foxx as Electro, Paul Giamatti as the Rhino, Chris Cooper as Norman Osborn, Dane DeHaan as Harry Osborn, Colm Feore as (possibly) the Vulture, Felicity Jones as (possibly) Black Cat and Shailene Woodley as Mary Jane Watson. 

What Sony's statement also suggests is that there is already a roadmap in place for where Spider-Man's story will go in the third and fourth movies, with speculation already out there that "The Amazing Spider-Man 2" could be setting the webslinger up for a future confrontation with the team of villains known as the Sinister Six.

That's one of the questions yet to be answered, along with who will be directing parts 3 and 4 -- we can't imagine Webb sticking around for more than three movies, but it's not unheard of. And if "The Amazing Spider-Man 2" flops outright? Yeah, sure, that'll happen.

"The Amazing Spider-Man 2" is out in theaters Friday, May 2, 2014.

For more on movies, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.
 

Guillermo Del Toro and crew talk building giant robots in new featurette

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse Fri 3:38 PM
Warner Bros.
We'll have a lot about director Guillermo Del Toro's "Pacific Rim" coming up in the next few weeks, but right now here's a new featurette on the creation of the movie's giant, Earth-defending robots, the Jaegers.


As Del Toro explains in the featurette, there is no Western tradition for how to design 250-foot-tall robots, or as he calls it, "a building walking around." He tells how he was heavily influenced by Japanese anime, but that he also told the crew never to talk about references -- that each robot would be designed to fit solely "within the universe of 'Pacific Rim.'"

Check out the clip below. The cast of "Pacific Rim" includes Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi, Charlie Day, Ron Perlman, Robert Kazinsky. Clifton Collins and others. 

The story chronicles a war between humanity and legions of monstrous creatures, known as Kaiju, who rise from the sea and bring civilization to the brink of extinction. Even the massive robots called Jaegers, controlled simultaneously by two pilots whose minds are locked in a neural bridge, have been nearly defeated by the relentless hordes of Kaiju. 

All hope lies with a washed up former pilot (Charlie Hunnam) and an untested trainee (Rinko Kikuchi) who are tasked with piloting a seemingly obsolete Jaeger from the past in a last-ditch effort to save the Earth.

"Pacific Rim" is out in theaters Friday, July 12, 2013.

For more on movies, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.


 

The gang's back and chomping at the bit in 3 new clips

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse Fri 1:35 PM
HBO
Blood, sex, reincarnation, vampires, shapeshifters, faeries, serial killers...yep, just everyday life on "True Blood," which kicks off its sixth season this Sunday (June 16) on HBO.


With premiere episode "Who Are You, Really," about to splatter onto TV screens everywhere, HBO has provided three new clips that will give you a sneak peek at the gruesome goings-on in Bon Temps and other points of interest.

Related: Most vicious 'True Blood' villains

As the show kicks off, the Authority has collapsed, TruBlood is getting harder to find and Bill Compton (Stephen Moyer, who also directed the season premiere) has been resurrected from a pool of blood into, shall we say, an enhanced version of himself.

Meanwhile, Andy (Chris Bauer) has four newborn human-faerie hybrids on his hands, Louisiana governor Truman Burrell (Arliss Howard) has declared all-out war on vampires and Jason (Ryan Kwanten) hitches a ride he may regret.

In addition to Moyer, Kwanten and Bauer, the returning cast includes Anna Paquin (Sookie), Alexander Skarsgard (Eric), Rutina Wesley (Tara), Sam Trammell (Sam), Nelsan Ellis (Lafayette), Carrie Preston (Arlene), Todd Lowe (Terry), Deborah Ann Woll (Jessica), Kristin Bauer van Straten (Pam), Joe Manganiello (Alcide) and about 687 more. 

New faces includes Howard, Rob Kazinsky as the mysterious stranger Ben, and the awesome Rutger Hauer as Niall, literally a faerie grandfather.

Check out the clips below, make sure you're well-stocked on your own supply of TruBlood (or whatever gets you through the night) and get ready to sink your teeth (sorry, we couldn't help it) into the 10-episode sixth season of "True Blood."

"True Blood" premieres Sunday, June 16 at 9 p.m. ET/PT on HBO.

Are you ready for more "True Blood"? Tell us on our MSN TV Facebook page and on Twitter.

'True Blood' sneak peek: Are you OK?


'True Blood' sneak peek: You'll be sorry  
 


'True Blood' sneak peek: Bill is out there


 

How does the new Superman movie stack up to the rest?

By DonKaye_ParallelUniverse Fri 11:33 AM
Warner Bros. Pictures
"Man of Steel" has arrived in theaters, and as more critics take their swings and audiences finally get to see this newest and perhaps biggest interpretation of Superman yet, the question will undoubtedly come up: How does director Zack Snyder's epic about the last son of Krypton stack up against all the previous ones?


We'll dispense with the 1948 and 1950 serials, as well as 1951's "Superman vs. the Mole Men," because it would be just silly to compare anything made today to those quaint early appearances of Kal-El on-screen (with all respect to Kirk Alyn and George Reeves, our first two cinematic Supermen). No, the obvious starting point is 1978 and "Superman: The Movie," the first truly modern superhero film and, along with "Jaws" and "Star Wars," one of the first films to herald the era of the tentpole blockbuster.

Related: Awesome Superman moments
| Songs about Superman
Warner Bros.
"Superman: The Movie" (1978): For us, Richard Donner's against-all-odds classic is still the gold standard for the character himself, and one of the top five superhero films of all time. Sure, some of the effects don't hold up (although you'd be surprised) and the movie still suffers a bit from its poetic first half giving way to its more comedic back end, but "Superman" has a weight, scale and grandeur that truly fit the character and the legendary origin story. Plus, the film is anchored in no small way by the brilliant, out-of-nowhere performance of Christopher Reeve, who truly made not just the Clark Kent-Superman split believable, but brought humanity, joy, hope, kindness and unabashed heroism to the role, defining Superman on-screen for all time.

Kudos must also go to Marlon Brando -- as kooky as the man was, his Jor-El gives the movie gravitas and majesty in those wonderful early scenes on Krypton -- and Gene Hackman, who may not be the Lex Luthor we all know and despise in the comics, but who laid down the template for the large-scale villains we enjoy today. Margot Kidder's spunky, liberated Lois Lane, Glenn Ford's moving Pa Kent, Jackie Cooper's grizzled Perry White -- the casting is spot-on throughout. The action and spectacle may not benefit from today's CG wizardry, but they do carry a pride of craftsmanship that a lot of today's generic blockbusters miss. "Superman" feels like it's made with love and respect -- which befits this most good-natured of superheroes.
Warner Bros.
"Superman II" (1981): The problematic "Superman II," started by one director (Donner) and finished by another (Richard Lester), is considered by some fans as superior to the original, but it's not. Yes, it is a "darker" film because it sets up two serious conflicts for Superman, both intimate (will he give up his powers for his love of Lois?) and global (can he defeat members of his own race whose strength matches his own?). But it undermines both of those narratives with cop-out solutions (can we ever forget the memory-wiping "Super Kiss"?).

That said, "Superman II" is still exciting and fun, and the centerpiece battle between Superman, Gen. Zod (Terence Stamp) and his underlings Non (Jack O'Halloran) and Ursa (Sarah Douglas) is genuinely thrilling when viewed through the context of knowing it was shot more than 30 years ago. That fight, by the way, foreshadows the return of Zod and a similar clash in "Man of Steel," although the new movie escalates things to a new and even disturbing level of mayhem. Because of the way it was shot and edited, "Superman II" feels choppy and occasionally sloppy, but it's still a worthy sequel to its masterful predecessor.
Warner Bros.
"Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut" (2006): Although Donner claimed to have shot around 75 percent of "Superman II" before being forced off the project, the version that came out in theaters featured only perhaps 25 percent of his footage (by his own estimation), as Richard Lester reshot most of the film to earn his sole director's credit. But after years of clamoring by fans, "The Richard Donner Cut" of "Superman II" -- encompassing about 83 percent of Donner's footage, with gaps filled by Lester's -- was restored and released on home video.

Is Donner's version better? It's hard to tell because it is still incomplete in some ways, but we would venture to say that the cut that exists now holds the promise of greatness (there's also a rare 146-minute edit of the film floating around out there). It restores crucial Brando footage that the producers and Lester did not use (for key scenes in the Fortress of Solitude in which the stored memories of Jor-El speak to his son) and transfers the "time travel" ending of the first movie to this one. There's less of Lester's slapstick approach apparent -- a welcome development completely tossed out the window by the next film in the series.
Warner Bros.
"Superman III" (1983): If there is any consistency between the first two "Superman" films and "Man of Steel," it's a sense of respect for the source material. That all went out the window in "Superman III," on which Lester fully took the reins and went for complete slapstick humor. Plans to feature Brainiac as the main villain were scrapped in favor of Robert Vaughn's bland corporate bad guy and, even worse, Richard Pryor's insufferable computer hacker. The sequence in which Superman turns "bad," eventually splitting into two selves (shades of Bizarro?), is still somewhat interesting thanks to Reeve, but most of this is just a mess.
Warner Bros.
"Superman IV: The Quest for Peace" (1987): Christopher Reeve's final performance in the cape was the result of his desire to say something about nuclear weapons, and "Superman IV" was supposed to be a return to a more serious tone after the high jinks of the third movie. But the new producers at Cannon Films cut the budget by more than half (from $35 million to $15 million), destroying whatever chances "Superman IV" had. Slow-moving, cheap-looking and disastrous in every way, "Superman IV" still represents the low point of the Man of Steel on film.
Warner Bros.
"Superman Returns" (2006): After 19 years and multiple attempts to resurrect the Superman franchise, director Bryan Singer finally made it happen with this direct sequel to the first two Reeve movies -- a conceit that ultimately worked against the film. The relatively unknown Brandon Routh does a decent Reeve impersonation, but nothing more, which is in keeping with the entire film's seeming desire to do nothing more but pay homage to the Donner-Lester movies, right down to Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey) launching another real estate scheme.

The debate over "Superman Returns" rages to this day: A cautiously positive initial reaction gave way to often harsh post-mortems, which in turn have begun recently to be pushed aside by more generous reappraisals. Despite some strong setpieces (like the shuttle rescue), the movie never generates much excitement and Superman is a largely passive character. Kate Bosworth's Lois Lane is forgettable and the "son of Superman" storyline a waste of time. In the end, it's a movie that feels like it was made by a fan -- who had nothing to say about his favorite superhero.
Warner Bros.
"Man of Steel" (2013): So how does the new reboot from director Snyder, writer David Goyer and producer Christopher Nolan rate in the overall franchise? By default, it's simply the best Superman movie since ... we'll say the first two, although it may be superior to "Superman II" in the long run. It's clearly the most technically and visually accomplished of them all by virtue of being made in the year 2013, even if it doesn't have a striking image like our first glimpse of Superman in the Fortress of Solitude in the 1978 movie. The first half of the film, which retells the origin story through flashbacks while following Clark Kent (Henry Cavill) as he drifts from job to job, feels a little like a quick run through Superman's "greatest hits," never giving us enough time to get emotionally invested.

Once Zod (Michael Shannon as the best and most complex Superman villain yet) shows up to find Kal-El and establish a new Krypton on Earth, the conflict becomes clear and focused and the epic nature of the story really kicks in. Yes, the last hour is exhausting and the sheer amount of destruction leveled on Metropolis is unsettling since there is almost no reference made to what must be horrific amounts of human casualties (something Superman would do everything he could to prevent). But this is also comic book superhero action on a level only previously found on the page, and at least gives a real feel for the power of these alien beings.

Henry Cavill is solid, strong and manly, as well as kind and ultimately endearing, but he doesn't quite match up to Reeve in the charisma department. Yet this movie sets him up well for future adventures. Amy Adams is terrific as Lois Lane, although the chemistry between her and Cavill needs work. Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner are dignified and moving as Clark's two fathers, Jor-El and Jonathan Kent. There are many great things about "Man of Steel," and we were often riveted, but it just misses being a great movie. It's no "Superman" -- perhaps no film will ever be -- but it's a stronger, more accomplished relaunch for our hero than anyone thought it could be.

To use Kal-El's own line in the movie...what do you think? Tell us on our MSN Movies Facebook page and on Twitter.

"Man of Steel" is out in theaters now.


Across the Universe is a weekly 5-part column written by Don Kaye. Follow him on Twitter @donkaye.

 
showtimes & tickets
Search by location, title, or genre: