Parallel Universe

Ian McKellen defends 'The Hobbit' trilogy decision

Actor says fans will want to watch movies 1,000 times

By Parallel Universe on MSN Dec 6, 2012 11:25AM
'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey'/New Line CinemaSir Ian McKellen has defended filmmaker Peter Jackson's decision to turn J.R.R. Tolkien's novel "The Hobbit" into a movie trilogy, insisting fans will be delighted to see three installments.

The director originally intended to make a two-part prequel to his "The Lord of the Rings" series, and came under fire after announcing he would release three epics instead. Critics accused him of trying to make more money by stretching out the classic book, but McKellen, who plays Gandalf the wizard, refutes the suggestion.

Bing: More about Ian McKellen | More about 'The Hobbit'

He tells The Hollywood Reporter, "Anyone who thinks Peter Jackson would fall for market forces around him rather than artistic integrity doesn't know the guy or the body of his work. If we just made one movie, 'The Hobbit,' the fact is that all the fans, the eight, nine and 10-year-old boys, they would watch it 1,000 times. Now, they've got three films they can watch 1,000 times."

Jackson explains he was able to expand the narrative by drawing from appendices Tolkien included with "The Return of the King," his third and final volume of "The Lord of the Rings."

Jackson tells The Hollywood Reporter, "'The (Hobbit)' is written in a very brisk pace, so pretty major events in the story are covered in only two or three pages... (We) wanted to do a little bit more character development, plus... we could also adapt the appendices of 'Return of the King,' which is 100-odd pages of material that sort of takes place around the time of The Hobbit, so we wanted to expand the story of "The Hobbit "a little bit more, as did Tolkien himself. So all those factors combined gave us the material to do it."
14Comments
Dec 6, 2012 4:22PM
avatar
I don't know what he means by saying eight, nine, and 10-year-old boys being the fans. I'm a 35 year old woman and I'm pretty sure I will watch all three movies 1,000 times.
Dec 6, 2012 4:39PM
avatar
Let's see, I've watched LOTR many many times. I've bought the set & will purchase The Hobbit regardless of how many movies are made. I have no idea where he gets the idea that 8,9 & 10 year olds will watch it. I know a lot of older men who enjoy that type of movie.  Tigerlady I'm more than twice your age & a male
Dec 6, 2012 5:54PM
avatar
I love how nobody understands the genius of Peter Jackson and why he can and will do this! I look forward to watching all of them :)
Dec 6, 2012 6:29PM
avatar

I think it is a great idea! A trilogy would be awesome!!

 

Dec 6, 2012 3:55PM
avatar

Let's see . . .    LOTR - Three books (4-500 (pb) pages each), three big movies.   The Hobbit - 1 medium sized (less than 300 (pb) pages, "brisk" or not) book, three (big?) movies. 

 

Can one say beating the (dead) Ca$h Cow!!!   (And yes, I've read them all.)

Dec 6, 2012 5:45PM
avatar

I'd see one movie, but not three.

 

Dec 6, 2012 7:02PM
avatar
There are many things happening during the timeframe of "The Hobbit" that are glossed over in the book or not discussed at all, other than some info in the appendices.  Although I am/have been a bit leery as to three, rather than two, films, there are many sub-plots and filling in of Middle Earth that can be told.  That said, it is a pity that there was "no time" to include "the Scouring of the Shire" in ROK, as it is such an important chapter in terms of the maturation and development of the hobbits.  Iknow as many folks were upset about the elimination of Tom Bombadil completely, too...and I suspect more than some of us were upset by the additional action of the Army of the Dead in the battle of Minas Tirith, as it diminished the heroic deeds of the living characters.  Would also have loved the scene (from the appendices) of Legolas and Gimli sailing to the West with the remains of Aragorn, Merry and Pippin...
Dec 6, 2012 5:54PM
avatar
They should have made the LOR into 6 movies! then they would not have had to put in stuff that was not in the books!
Dec 6, 2012 5:25PM
avatar

Ian McKellen is right about the "fans want more" of the Jackson-directed "The Hobbit" . He is being much to specific when he describes the fanbase though..."8, 9, and 10 year-olds" are just a fraction of the fans that will be viewing "The Hobbit" more times than would seem sane. I am 45 years-old and will be giving the "8, 9, and 10 year-olds" a run for their money in the "repeat viewing of The Hobbit" arena........

The only real shame in all of this is the fact that Jackson and the producers could have had no idea that the LOTR-Trilogy would be received as well as it has been or they would likely have done the same with the first three films and STRETTTCHHHEEDDD them out into a minimum of six films.Thanks to the HUGE success of the LOTR Trilogy Jackson has the "juice" with the "money boyz" to get the OKAY to make "The Hobbit" into a trilogy and give us MORE of the wonderful world that was Middle Earth.......

THE FANS gave Jackson the leverage he needed to get this thing done and our reward will be coming to us over the next 3 years.....WHOOOOPPPPPPPPEEEEEE.......can't wait.......

Dec 15, 2012 3:30PM
avatar

Elijah Wood didn't know why so many people that were not young boys would like LOTR.  I did, and I'm a 53-year-old woman.  Tolkien was a genious.  Jackson is a genious.  And they were both fortunate to get backing to publish on a world scale.  The book is my favorite of all the books I've ever read, and I'ver read a great deal, certainly all of  the classics.  Yes, far better than The Ovid. Better than Anna Karenina. Better than The Great Gadsby. I don't care for his poetry, but his prose makes up for it gangbusters.

 

I'm pleased Peter can do this.  I can't think any producer or director that could do justice.  Thank you Peter.

Dec 6, 2012 4:18PM
avatar

Even stretching The Hobbit out to the max, it is at best, ONE longish movie... possible TWO if you want to get greedy. THREE movies to cover this book is just obscenely blatant greed. I've read the book several times, thereby playing the movie in my head. I guess this is called riding the Hollywood gravy train. Thank you, but I won't be watching or buying this bloated movie.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
showtimes & tickets
Search by location, title, or genre: