Parallel Universe

'Star Trek Into Darkness' unveiling 9 minutes of IMAX 3D footage

Fans to get first look at new movie in December

By Parallel Universe on MSN Nov 15, 2012 12:15PM
'Star Trek'/Paramount Pictures
By Brent Lang
The Wrap


"Star Trek" fans will get their first look at what's next for Captain Kirk and crew thanks to a sneak peek on IMAX 3D screens this December.

Bing: More about Chris Pine

Paramount Pictures will premiere nine minutes from the J.J. Abrams sequel, which carries the impressively vague title of "Star Trek Into Darkness."

Also read: Zachary Quinto Says 'Star Trek' Sequel Will be 'Bigger, Bolder'
 
The film, which brings back a cast that includes Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, hits theaters on May 17, 2013.

This first look at what's cooking on the bridge of the U.S.S. Enterprise will play in some 500 digital IMAX 3D theatres beginning Dec. 14. It will serve as the opening act to IMAX screenings of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey."

It marks only the third time a first look will be released in IMAX.


28Comments
Nov 16, 2012 4:40PM
avatar

Never thought I could buy off on a new Kirk/Spock/Bones/Crew.  I tend to be loyal to originals (ie: only Sean Connery is James Bond, etc).  But the first movie of this reboot was surprisingly good, and the new Spock and McCoy were astonishingly similar to their predecessors.  I look forward to the next installment.

Nov 16, 2012 3:19PM
avatar
Thats the stupidest thing I've heard in a long time! Here's a SIMPLE solution for you Chiles43,  If you dont like the New Star Trek movies, DONT GO TO THEM! ...and Learn how to spell!
Nov 16, 2012 5:21PM
avatar
I was awe struck on how well they did the last movie I mean they nailed it the thing that could have been better was to spend an additional time on the characters I mean like 3-5 minuets of developing them. I cannot wait for this new one. Hollywood sucks mostly especially on the remakes!!  Hope they allow the characters to b themselves!!
Nov 16, 2012 5:52PM
avatar
The last movie did well introducing the earlier versions of Capt. Kirk and the rest of the crew...they look very close to their elders..I can only hope they can continue with the series and the transition.....and the next Priceline Negotiator.
Nov 16, 2012 7:58PM
avatar
What is wrong with some of you people talking trash about the last Star Trek movie?  I thought it was cleverly done and was pretty much what I anticipated it to be.  It was basically a prequel on how their  crew's journeys began.  Show some optimism here and if you are a true fan of Star Trek you would know exactly what I was talking about and appreciate the new movies. 
Nov 16, 2012 4:17PM
avatar
I agree with you MJDOG... Chiles is a typical left wing extremist... if HE doesnt like something, the rest of us should have to go without also. He's probably just angry because the theater wouldnt accept his food stamps for popcorn and soda. Cut him some slack... he is a typical illiterate, ignorant jackass
Nov 16, 2012 6:43PM
avatar
I never thought I would like the new Star Trek being a huge fan of the original but I was very impressed with the new cast, all except the new Uhura, I wish they had cast a better actress but other than that the story and the passing of the torch by older Spock to new Spock was classic. Looking forward to the new film....
Nov 16, 2012 4:47PM
avatar
Gotta love the entertainment value, no reality, lots of action.  If you don't like it you just don't get it. Sad..........
Nov 16, 2012 5:07PM
avatar

This is for Chiles43--Did you ever go to school?  Are you as dumb as your sentences?

 

You need your "real burnied," to borrow a quote from you.

Nov 16, 2012 9:14PM
avatar
These movies are okay.. I don't put them into the same category as the series or the original movies but mentally label them as fun sci-fi and since I'm a huge sci-fi/fantasy fan I take them with a grain of salt.. BUT, I do NOT consider them to be in the same ballpark with TOS or the other spin-offs.. There is nothing of Gene Roddenberry in Abrams movies, there is no real thought behind them, they may bear the same names but that's about it.. Roddenberry had a dream when he developed the series that they would, in their own way, 'make a difference' as the Captains would say and I think each one did in their own way..
He tried to show, in many cases, that we could and would someday overcome our differences, our petty and long-standing bigotries, our intolerance and, most importantly, the slow destruction of this world, the ONLY one we have right now.. He and other writers wrote many great episodes that tried to show us their were better ways to go about things and who knows how much influence they had.. Sometimes it seems as though they had none at all but most of us old 'Trekkies' still have some deep-seated hope for a real 'Star Trek' Universe..
Nov 19, 2012 10:58AM
avatar
Chiles... Gene Roddenberry may have died, but the "IDEA" he created will live long after him.
Nov 17, 2012 12:35AM
avatar

I'm a huge fan of Star Trek, but was disappointed by the movie. Don't get me wrong it’s still a good movie in fact I own it - but the whole alternate timeline is very very old theme. Along the lines of the evil twin/doppelganger/clone whatever.

In the original Star Trek universe where the” Prime” Spock (Leonard Nimoy) was from they travelled into the past many times to save the future.  Would this Spock now stuck in an alternate timeline have settled for the destruction of two worlds and billions upon billions of lives - that’s not the Mr. Spock I remember.

The “Prime” Spock also states at one point to the younger Mr. Spock (Quinto)”since my customary farewell would seem self-serving I merely say good luck” – if this was an alternate timeline the younger Spock’ future would take a different direction than the older – it was illogical for the Prime Spock to assume otherwise.

I’m hoping as long as they keep making them – they will improve just as all the series did with time.

----time (hopefully not travel) will tell.   LLAP

Nov 16, 2012 11:37PM
avatar

New series is great.  Best selection of actors for a new Sci-Fi movie ever.

Nov 27, 2012 9:33PM
avatar

I loved the new Star Trek for all the reasons mentioned here. I loved the new take on Warp Space. I loved the fact that the Enterprise has plumbing. (Obviously not the grey-water pipes) I loved that Kirk's dad was Thor (Heh heh). They did a great job with actors to play the parts. The glaring exception was a teeny-boppin Kirk. There should have been more intelligence, and less posturing to his arrogance + competence. Don't get me wrong, I love Chris Pine. I consider it a major scripting + directoral error.

CHILES43, 2 words- Spell Check. Too bad there's not a Punctuation Check and a Stupid Check.

Nov 27, 2012 6:14PM
avatar
yay! chris pine was sooooo awesome as kirk, can't wait to see more! and i'm not even a trekkie! 
wait ... that's what they're called, right?
Nov 17, 2012 8:56PM
avatar
wonder if kermit the frog could have a role in this new movie??
Nov 17, 2012 12:42AM
avatar
I loved, loved, loved the Star Trek movie. I went 5 times to the theater and saw it a few times when it was on FX recently.  I always disliked the tv shows that came later. I started watching the orig show in the early 70s when i was about 15.  Had a mad crush on Capt Kirk. It never went away, but watching the show, in the years since then, Shatner never ages but I turned old. Oh well Shat happens. Cant wait for the new one. The first one was perfect.  I liked that Spock was with uhura.
Nov 16, 2012 10:15PM
avatar
One of these days Abrams will think of something on his own instead of continually ripping on other people's ideas and totally ruining them.  The first of his so-called Star Trek movies was a total abortion and travesty; was not Star Trek at all.  Now he continues to destroy a legendary franchise with yet another abortion.  I'll skip this one for sure.
Nov 16, 2012 10:03PM
avatar

JJ Abrams should stick to producing mediocre TV series and stop trying to "direct" feature films. Especially when the source material he works with has already been done better in the first place! Abrams, Orci, and Kurtzman are hacks. The last so called "Star Trek" film they made was not even Star Trek. It was a really badly made, contrived, lens flare/plot hole filled  science fiction film that simply contained elements of the original Star Trek.

That's where the similarities end.

Abrams is putting the final nails in Star Trek's coffin.

 

Star Trek 1966-2009

 

R.I.P

Nov 16, 2012 4:44PM
avatar
I understand where Chiles43 is coming from. The last "Star Trek" was a bit of a disappointment. I was expecting more. That doesn't mean that y'all need to vilify him for not liking it. Hey, that's why Hollywood puts out 100 movies a year so people have choices, right? Let's just focus on the next one. I'm kind of excited about it.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
showtimes & tickets
Search by location, title, or genre: