MSN Movies Blog

'3:10 to Yuma' and 'Jubal' get the Criterion treatment

By SeanAx Wed 9:14 AM

"Jubal" (Criterion)

"3:10 to Yuma" (Criterion)


Delmer Daves was a Hollywood pro with a long career and an impressive filmography. He established himself as a screenwriter with a series of light comedies and romantic melodramas (including the original 1939 "Love Affair") before stepping behind the camera with the World War II adventure "Destination Tokyo." Like most directors of his era, he moved easily between all genres – war pictures, romances, melodrama, and a few noir-inflected dramas (notably "The Red House" and "Dark Passage"), but he proved his affinity for the western from his very first effort in the genre, the 1950 classic "Broken Arrow." Along with his fine eye for imagery, Daves brought a psychological dimension and an adult sensibility to his westerns. In his best films, his characters had relationships and emotions that came out of real life.

 

Criterion's stamp on two of his most interesting westerns may help bring a little more attention to the director. "Jubal" (Criterion) is the first of three westerns Daves made with actor Glenn Ford, already a seasoned western presence by 1956. Here he's an itinerate cowhand and a wary loner hired by rancher Ernest Borgnine, a garrulous, generous guy who becomes both father figure and best friend to the emotionally bottled up cowhand. It's been called "Othello" on the range, with Rod Steiger as the bitter ranch hand playing Iago to Borgnine's Othello, but the Desdemona of this piece is no innocent victim but a dark, exotic beauty (she's Canadian, apparently to explain away Valerie French's accent) in a stifling marriage to the sincere but crude and boisterous cattleman. Young and deeply disenchanted, she sets her eyes on the simple, stoic cowboy.


 

This is less a Shakespeare western than a Hollywood melodrama in chaps and Daves was a seasoned hand at both genres. He favors suspense to action and violence, tightening the tension until Steiger (himself spurned by French) finally pushes his boss over the edge and the cycle of violence begins. Even then, the violence is brief and abrupt and Daves leaves the most brutal assault offscreen. Noah Beery Jr. and John Dierkes offer easy-going support as Ford's friendly bunkmates and fellow cowhands and Charles Bronson takes a small but key role as a plain-speaking cowhand whose loyalty to Ford's Jubal is unshakable even when Steiger turns the town against him. Daves brings out Bronson's easy-going humor and understated style, a side so rarely tapped by other directors.


Continue reading at Videodrone


For more releases, see Hot Tips and Top Picks: DVDs, Blu-rays and streaming video for week of May 14

 

The new-school Kirk and Spock talk ...

By James Rocchi Wed 8:20 AM

 

Since 2009's "Star Trek," the actors playing the film's central duo have had no small amount of success in its wake; Chris Pine will step into the shoes of Baldwin, Ford and Affleck with the upcoming "Jack Ryan," while Zachary Quinto produced and appeared in the Oscar-nominated "Margin Call." "Star Trek Into Darkness" sees the two back as Kirk and Spock, with more than a few changes this time; we spoke to Pine and Quinto in London about the film.

 

MSN Movies: The reason why people love "Star Trek" isn't just the plots or the pitch of the series; it's the relationships between the characters. How much fun is it to play the classic Kirk-Spock relationship and live up to it, in a way?

 

Zachary Quinto: Very fun. And it's a great pleasure to do it with somebody that I enjoy working with, hanging out with, spending time with. And I think our off-screen relationship informs the dynamic of the characters we play. And that's great fun.

 

Chris Pine: Yeah. These characters are fun because they come from such completely different kind of worldviews. And I think that people can relate to it, or it resonates through people, because they see that, I think, like in their own lives, whether it's themselves trying to find a balance between the mind and the body or with people in their lives. But certainly what they find in the beginning to be the differences that drive them apart are actually those things that drive them together in the end.

 

A great thing about the first film and this film is that Kirk gets beaten up a lot more than he dishes out. Is that a key to the character  -- that you'll always get up no matter how inadvisable it is?


Bing: More about Chris Pine l Bing: More about Zachary Quinto

 

Pine: Yeah, I think you're exactly right. I think it's fun to see, just like with McClane in the "Die Hard" series. It's always fun to see the underdog kind of in the face of great obstacle and great hardship get up again and again and again. And I think that that is a sign of a good leader.

 

Speaking of action, Mr. Quinto, you get a heck of a fight scene in this, and part of that you do that the "Terminator 2"/Tom Cruise action elbow-run. Is stuff like that fun to do even on the day?

 

 

Why all the fuss over a movie nobody wants?

By Corwin Neuse Tue 8:05 PM
Terrible news, everyone! According to The Hollywood Reporter, diviners of all things true and vastly-important, toy maker Hasbro is reportedly suing Warner Bros. over their planned sequel/remake/reboot/whatever of 2000's disastrous "Dungeons & Dragons" board-game adaptation. Why such a fuss over the property, when the original film made back barely three quarters of its production budget, making it only slightly more successful, financially speaking, than the Bubonic plague? We have no idea, although we're sure that the "Transformers" movies have done much to change the perception of toy/hobby-based films in Hollywood accounting circles.

Bing: Dungeons & Dragons | biggest box-office bombs

On the one hand, such a lawsuit might preclude the film from ever seeing the light of day. Which is sad, in a sense, if you're a fan of dice, arguing over the magical properties of +5 Dragon Slayers, and maybe staying home "sick" from school to play World of Warcraft. On the other hand, such a lawsuit might preclude the film from ever seeing the light of day... Which is great, if you think a D&D film is a terrible idea, and you wish Hollywood would just come up with something original for a change, already. So... How are we supposed to feel about this?

For more movie news, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.
 

Will play the film's villain

By Corwin Neuse Tue 7:47 PM
Great news, fans of obscure French action flicks and/or guilty-pleasure kung fu movies: according to The Hollywood Reporter, triple threat RZA is joining "Brick Mansions," the upcoming "District B13" remake starring Paul Walker, as the film's villain.

Bing: 'Brick Mansions' | RZA

RZA, who most recently co-starred in and directed the Russell Crowe-led "The Man with the Iron Fists," will ostensibly play a powerful drug dealer who holds a city hostage with a stolen neutron bomb. Walker will play the undercover cop who's sent in to recover or disarm the bomb, aided by outlaw vigilante/modern-day Robin Hood figure/Parkour progenitor David Belle, who also starred in the original. For some reason, RZA's casting seems perfect, if only in the sense that it's completely unexpected, he's an appropriately terrible actor, and just seeing his name in the credits will add some immeasurable quality to the film's already considerable cult appeal.

For more movie news, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.
 

Without characters, 'all the big action battles, chases, fight scenes, all that stuff would never have any meaning ...'

By James Rocchi Tue 7:33 PM

Having given himself a hard act to follow with 2009's "Star Trek" -- and having a hypothetical future of the same now that he's signed on board to bring "Star Wars" back to the big screen -- director J.J. Abrams is a man whose present is all about the future. We spoke with him in London about working with Gene Roddenberry's creations, what he had to do this time around and if he has any worlds left to conquer ...

 

MSN Movies: You had the first film, which was a critical and commercial success. You know you're doing a second film. When did you think to yourself, "I need to do this, and I want to do that"? What were your needs and wants for this movie?

 

J.J. Abrams: I've got to say that the key for this film was, I think, we needed to approach it like a standalone film. I thought that it was critical that we not rely on people having seen the original series or the film we made before. This wants to be its own thing. In terms of what I want to do is I wanted to make it bigger, and better, and more emotional, and more exciting, more action. And the key to it being I think a better movie is that you go deeper with the characters, that they make you laugh, that they make you feel that their debates are personal and specific. Otherwise all the big action battles, chases, fight scenes, all that stuff would never have any meaning.

 

There are plenty of '60s science fiction TV shows like "Land of the Giants" or "Time Tunnel" that we're not still watching 50 years later, primarily because Star Trek has those great character relationships. Is it fun to know that's the underpinning of everything, not the explosions and 3D?

 

BING: More about Gene Roddenberry l BING: More about J.J. Abrams


Yes. The key to this movie working is, no question, the characters. And while we are incredibly lucky to have an extraordinary cast playing these roles, I do agree with you that it really is the characters, the sort of archetypes, the dynamic that Roddenberry created that really gives this thing its heart and soul. So we really honor the thing that the original fans loved about the show that I later came to appreciate. But at the same time we wanted to infuse it with a kind of visceral energy and say those characters you love, having those debates, dealing with those sort of moral philosophical dilemmas, they are sort of thrust into an adventure that is a little bit more speedy, a little bit more action adventure, a little bit more intense. And that to me was sort of the balance that every day we're struggling to achieve.

 

An action film is often only as good as its nemesis. How great was it to cast Benedict Cumberbatch with those eyes and that demeanor and that voice?

 

Romantic comedy stars Domhall Gleeson, Rachel McAdams

By Corwin Neuse Tue 7:32 PM
We've all thought about it, at one time or another: what if we could somehow go back in time—to the time of our choosing, naturally—and change something about our life? Like, for example, what if we could revisit that disastrous New Years Eve party and actually kiss the girl/guy of our dreams, you know, instead of just awkwardly shaking their hand and generally making a fool of ourselves. How would our lives have changed, if at all?

Bing: 'About Time' | Richard Curtis

Such is the premise of "Love Actually" auteur Richard Curtis's upcoming "About Time." The famous "Notting Hill" scribe has enlisted relative newcomer Domhall Gleeson ("Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows") to star as the central time-traveling romantic vagabond, along with frequent collaborator Bill Nighy ("Love Actually," "The Boat that Rocked") as his dad, and America's Sweetheart™ Rachel McAdams as his love interest/foil. While not as expansive a cast as his previous directorial offerings, still, not too shabby.

What do you think, Hitlisters? Is Curtis the man to bring together science-fiction, romance, and comedy? Did "Seeking a Friend for the End of the World" already do that, minus the, er, comedy? Or was that "Safety Not Guaranteed?" Did anybody actually see that? We forget. Check out the trailer, posted after the break, courtesy of Yahoo!, and let us know what you think in the comments, or on MSN Movies Facebook or MSN Movies Twitter.

 

'I want to bring a little bit of femininity to "Star Trek" ...'

By James Rocchi Tue 4:37 PM

 

One of the new introductions to the film franchise's canon along Benedict Cumberbatch, Alice Eve is looking thoroughly modern -- and only a little futuristic -- as she talks about her role in J.J. Abrams' second feature boldly going where many have gone before, "Star Trek Into Darkness." The London-born actress spoke with MSN in London about future fashion, the scale of IMAX and about breaking up the boys' club on the bridge of the Enterprise.

 

MSN Movies: What's it like to step into this fully realized world that's newly recreated by J.J. Abrams? Did you feel like you had to get up to speed a little bit?

 

Alice Eve: One hundred percent, and (I had to) keep up. J.J. moves at warp speed, so keeping up with him is not easy.

 

The other great thing about these films is their sort of retro-futuristic look that hearkens back to the original series but speaks of a future of space-faring adventure. Did you find that getting into that, with bob haircut and the high-tech retro outfit ... is that part of the fun of doing the film?

 

Well observed! You know J.J. and I had conversations about what hair I would do and whether people in space have hair, whether they wash their hair, whether their hair was like, you know, you take a pill and it stays exactly how you want it to be. So what we decided was that we'd throw in the Vidal Sassoon like '60s bob, which goes from short to long, and we shaved the back of my head. Then we kind of went with the fact that Carol would have hair that moved.

 

So you didn't want to have it lacquered up like you're in a little space helmet?

 

Yeah, I didn't want a helmet.


Bing: More about Alice Eve l Bing: More about J.J. Abrams

 

Saying "I like Star Trek" these days is kind of as broad as saying, "I like wine." There's the different shows and different films. What flavor of Star Trek prior to this was your favorite?

 

I think the Bordeaux of Star Trek is definitely J.J.'s 2009 movie.

 

 

But he doesn't look very super-villainous

By Corwin Neuse Mon 9:06 PM
"The Amazing Spider-Man 2" director Marc Webb's Twitter feed might as well giant flashing HTML *SPOILER* warning, if such things existed. Every day, the man—or maybe his publicist—takes a break from his various and myriad duties directing the Marvel superhero franchise to post pictures chronicling the hotly anticipate sequel's progress. Over the weekend, Webb posted the attached image, which purports to be the first glimpse of Paul Giamatti as Aleksei Sytsevich, also known as "The Rhino."


Those stalking the film's NYC production may have noticed Spidey battling Mr. Giamatti while the latter is behind the wheel of a speeding 18-wheeler. Unseen by those passersby, perhaps, are the details of "The Rhino's" costume and character seen herein, like the barb-wire tat across his forehead. One can only presume that said tattoo is, in fact, a part of Giamatti's costume, and not an artifact of his recent stint playing Hamlet at the Yale Rep.

For more movie news, follow MSN Movies on Facebook and Twitter.
 
showtimes & tickets
Search by location, title, or genre: