MSN Movies Blog

Are the Golden Globes Less Valid Than the Oscars?

For years, many have questioned the practices of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the group behind the awards show

By DannyMiller Dec 16, 2011 5:12PM

The nominations for the 69th Golden Globe Awards were announced this week—newspaper ads and electronic billboards are already blaring the number of nominations various films received. While it will be one of the first big awards shows of the new year (NBC will air the show live on January 15) and while some consider the nominations a window into the upcoming Oscar race, others imply that the reputation of the Globes pales by comparison. Selected by the very small (around 80 members) and some say questionable Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the awards have been beset by scandals and controversies since their earliest days. I still remember the infamous Pia Zadora affair when, in 1982, the actress was honored as “New Star of the Year” for her brilliant (*cough*) performance in the soft-core classic “Butterfly.” Many thought that her billionaire husband, Meshulam Riklis, bought her the award. Oy.

 

In some ways, the HFPA’s shaky rep makes the awards show even more watchable than the sometimes staid Academy Awards. And now, with bad boy Ricky Gervais once again hosting, with his delicious tendency to slaughter the hand that feeds him, the show promises to be a real humdinger. Here’s one Gervais quote from last year’s broadcast: “I’d like to quash this ridiculous rumor going round that the only reason ‘The Tourist’ was nominated was so the Hollywood Foreign Press could hang out with Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie. That is rubbish. That is not the only reason. They also accepted bribes.” Now that's funny! 

 

Nikki Finke of Deadline refused to comment on the nominations this week because, according to her, “the Golden Globes have zero integrity…it’s a completely meaningless awards show from a scandal-ridden organization on a network desperate for ratings.” Ouch. Finke continues: “Hollywood filmmakers and TV producers who lavishly lobby the HFPA almost always score nominations. Stars win in direct correlation to their glamour quotient.” She cites documentary filmmaker Vikram Jayanti, who, in his 2004 film, “The Golden Globes: Hollywood’s Dirty Little Secret,” called the group a bunch of “freeloaders” who know more about hors d’oeuvres than auteurs and select winners based on “who kisses butt best.”

 

Does knowing this affect your desire to watch the Golden Globes? It does for me—with all these charges hanging in the air and the likelihood of ridicule and crazy upsets, I wouldn’t miss it for the world!


16Comments
Jan 5, 2012 4:39PM
avatar
I don't know about their validity, but the Globes sure are more fun than the Oscars, which I wouldn't miss either.  Besides it's refreshing to see all those marvelous actors in a glamorous, sociable dinner setting that encourages more candid reactions to winning or losing after having a glass or two.  They just seem to be less formal, less guarded and having more fun.  And that makes the event more fun for the TV audience too.  I love the this Awards program and wouldn't dream of missing its telecast.
Dec 18, 2011 1:33PM
avatar

@awards are so what 

 

The thing is, is that there is a massive sense of community and culture that come with both the expression involved in being in a family enviornment and enjoying them.    My family and I like a few others made an event out of it almost like the superbowl.   Thus it being an example that much Of what the Community draws from.  Just because bush is a little bit threatnd by the 100 years from now scenarios doesn't mean we can't start reparing his none sense.

Dec 17, 2011 4:35PM
avatar
I can think of nothing less relevant than acting for a living. These people put on their gowns and tuxedos and honestly think they matter in this world. They feel they're above average people. They look like a bunch of clowns who think they're important. To get teary eyed like it's an honor... It really makes me sick.
Dec 17, 2011 4:15PM
avatar
Well, obviously the award show matter to some viewers. The Golden Globes still has enough of an appeal to draw an audience in justifying the broadcast.  The author of this article seems to think controversy is special for the Golden Globes. There has been controversy attached to all award shows. What makes this show worth speaking bad of? Seems that "foreign" is a bad word to some.
Dec 17, 2011 4:08PM
avatar

Who cares?  It's all about self centered egotisticals that don't give a rip about anyone but themselves.   Take the money it took to buy the awards and put on the 2 shows, then give it to the starving children in America.

Dec 17, 2011 3:51PM
avatar
Just a bunch of out-of touch self-agrandizing liberal celebrities j-rking each other off.
Dec 17, 2011 3:04PM
avatar

I love Ricky Gervais - he is the only reason to watch.

 

Dec 17, 2011 2:39PM
avatar
The Oscar's are miles more important. TV show's in a so-called movie award's show? No thanks
Dec 17, 2011 2:07PM
avatar
One more thing, because they make so much money, they think they are experts on everything from politics to relationships to life in general.   Get a life! Get Real, and just disappear from the radar. 
Dec 17, 2011 2:04PM
avatar
Golden Globes, Oscars....or any of these self serving Award shows are meaningless to most people. Especially now with things not correct in this country. Over paid and way too much ego award shows mean really nothing except how much the winner will get for his or her next flick....  Bah Humbug......lol   Do some good things instead of worrying about who wins a  stupid award.

Whether it is a TV or Movie or reality Show not too many people really care. usually the winning movie is not one that was seen by a large part of the public. usually some obscure movie. I mean, how many times will Meryl Streep be nominated for a movie no one sees? While actors like Harrison Ford, Sean Connery, or Daniel Craig go without winning? Or even Sandra bullock (She won once) or other more talented female actresses like Scarlett Johannson or even Lena Heady are ignored for the most part.

If the film is NOT popular the public has determined it is crap. So why do unpopular and unseen films with no talent actors and actresses win all the time? 

Award shows are worthless crap.
Dec 17, 2011 2:03PM
avatar

With so many people hurting in this bad economy, this Hollywood is nothing but glorified b.s..  Who cares really?  Who cares what they wear?  What they say?  How they act?  How they look after having a baby?  We all don't have personal servants, personal trainers at our disposal.  Instead of having these gawdy displays of nonsense, they should donate some of their gazillions to charitable causes, work in soup kitchen or pantries, help find ways to offer support the homeless including families  who go without food and shelter in this country.  Offer to help where it's needed instead of trying to out do their thespian bretheren with their expensive jewelery, mansions, cars, and the list goes on.  They are over paid, over rated, and over done!!!!  Many of them in Hollywood  live in a bubble, out of touch with the rest of the nation.

The media seems to be the only one who really cares what they say or do. 

Dec 17, 2011 1:30PM
avatar
the Globes seem important to TV "stars" --people like Eva Longoria-- who don't have the skills or clout do movie films.  So, they serve that purpose -- kind of like the Emmy's.  However, the ones I feel really matter are the Oscars as the best actors, directors, writers are in feature films, not TV.  There are a few exceptions -- mosty actors who earned their chops in feature filmsbut then decided to do a TV gig-- Laura Linney, Claire Danes, a few.  Nonetheless, I follow both because of the dresses!  ha.
Dec 17, 2011 12:58PM
avatar

I agree with Harleycodger. It is nothing but people touting their own accomplishments with no input from the people who go the movies. How many times have big box office movies won the award? Not many. It is usually critically acclaimed crap. I never watch enterrtainment award shows

Dec 17, 2011 11:34AM
avatar
I don't give a large rodent's behind about ANY of these awards-just a bunch of people patting themselves on the back for doing their job. They're all less exciting than watching paint dry.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
showtimes & tickets
Search by location, title, or genre: