Next summer's 'Man of Steel' to receive the 3D treatment, because money
On the heels of Warner Brothers' after-the-fact conversion of Guillermo del Toro's 'Pacific Rim'
In the wake of "Titanic," it's virtually impossible for any blockbuster to put up record-breaking numbers without the help of an IMAX or 3D surcharge. (Thus, last spring's re-release of that film and next year's planned revivals of "Jurassic Park" and "Independence Day.") Christopher Nolan might have the kind of sway as a director to do without 3D conversion, but as a producer on "Man of Steel," that would appear to be less so.Well I won't be shelling out the extra money for the 3D version of Superman. I think the 3D conversion movies (Like Star Wars: The Phantom Menace) are a waste of money. When the movies are actually shot in 3D to begin with (Like Avatar) they are really good.
I'm also kind of against reboot reboot movies. I liked the Toby McGuire Spiderman movies. There have already been many Superman reboot movies and TV shows already, why do we need another one? If they are going to change up Superman, I'd like to see a prequel movie showing all the events leading up to the destruction of Krypton. Then the second movie would be with Kal El on earth. I think that would be much more interesting than just putting yet another actor in red and blue jammies.
movie news
- Bolivia lashes at Sean Penn over jailed American
- Harry Potter book with author notes sold for $228K
- Muppets creator's items head to NYC museum
- Depardieu to play a Chechen man seeking revenge
- Kate Hudson joins Zach Braff in Kickstarter movie
- Ari Folman animates Robin Wright in 'The Congress'
- The Fall song was too scary for 'Twilight'
- 'The Hangover III' vs. 'Fast & Furious 6' and four more summer box-office smackdowns
- Chilean miner happy to be played by Banderas in film
- Seth MacFarlane won't host Oscars, recommends Joaquin Phoenix for 2014








