Robert Christgau's Music Criticism Blog - Expert Witness - MSN Music

Fiona Apple/Regina Spektor

Piano Women

By Xgau Jul 24, 2012 5:31AM

 

Fiona Apple: The Idler Wheel Is Wiser Than the Driver of the Screw and Whipping Cords Will Serve You More Than Ropes Will Ever Do (Epic)

A funny thing will happen once you've figured out that the title is the stupidest thing about an album that's damn catchy after all. It'll sound like a piano record‑-a defiantly primitivist, raucously avant-garde lounge singer's piano record, with a really nutty drummer: he'll-bang-on-anything (and-get-her-to-pitch-in) producer Charley Drayton. There are few arpeggios, and not much tone color and such. She just executes simple figures and hammers thick chords, including a few boogie-woogies just to make a point. She also sings‑-words, yes, but more decisively, sounds. Not background music. But you could sure call it mood music. A MINUS

 

Regina Spektor: What We Saw From the Cheap Seats (Sire)

Outside of country music (and I don't know who compares there), pop music is home to few friendlier artists than Regina Spektor. So well-meaning you want to kiss the tip of her nose, she uses her classical chops to craft tunes that will help any normal listener smile. But although a practical humanist is a rare thing, this one often needs more spice or even grit, and here her whimsy is front and center. I love "All the Rowboats," about a museum‑-"Masterpieces serving maximum sentences/It's their own fault/For being timeless"‑-and "Firewood," about a piano. "Ballad of a Politician" plays off "Shake it, shake it baby" (hands, get it?) and "Open" comes with a gurgling groan. But many of these songs are merely bemused, and when she revises "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good," all she achieves is a different singalong from the one you expected. B PLUS

 

116Comments
Jul 27, 2012 9:10AM
avatar

Funniest thing today-glancing on the right under "music news" and seeing-

"Katherine Jackson Breaks Her Silence"- hey ,is this a great country or what?

Must start paying more attention to "music news". Scotch , please.

Jul 27, 2012 12:37AM
avatar
Part 2:
 

In my music listening world, the peaks that become classic come from the accumulated individual moments that make me stop and focus (seems obvious but I won’t speak for anyone else on how classic comes to be for you.) When the Fabs lean into the mic together for the “Yeah, yeah, yeahs”, when Jimi plays that four part solo in “All Along The Watchtower”, when Jon and Sally and Tom sing “Lose, (lose), lose, (lose), lose, (loooose), lose your head“  in unison in “Euridyce”, when the “oooh, ooh, ooh”s" come in after the guitar figure that opens “Kabassele In Memoriam”, when Rochereau overlays his harmonies on the same song, the first two bars of “My Girl”, the first time I heard the rhythm to “Billie Jean”, all those Al Jackson, Jr. off beats.  When I am forced to do nothing but stop and listen. The more of those an artist can conjure, the higher they climb for me.

 

George Jones singing seems like one peak moment after the other. Every note of the verse in the barely two minutes of “We Can Make It” that goes “Now’ll say goodbye to storuhrmee (3 syllables) weather/Safe weth-inn each (whatanote!) others arms/We can spend our life (whatanote!) togeh-ether”; the way “thewordsand” is one word in “Don’t Send Me No Angels”; each time he sings either “ever” or “every” in “What My Woman Can’t Do”; the “any more”, “di-id” and “so much” in the first verse of “I’ll Just Take It Out In Love”; “war/more” both extended, in “The Door” plus the forced enunciation of “tear-stained eyes I watched her” in the same song; the swing in the chorus of “Loving You Could Never Be Better”; the meticulous, precise note choices in “There’ll Be No Teardrops Tonight”. Heck, every single note in “I’m All She’s Got” from Alone Again. Double heck, virtually every held consonant/vowel/consonant word that ends a line or verse or chorus.

 

I know many of you know this all already. And I know you know that a list like this is pretty much inexhaustible. I’ll stop here out of a combination of embarrassment at being so late to the party and fear of saying more than I actually know. I’m only four albums into a multi-decade career. I think I have probably listed only the most obvious, potent vocalizations. There seem to be tons of gentle, nuanced vocal choices that I haven’t fully caught the power of yet. So once iToons re-establishes itself, I’ll dive in deeper. Work, work, work.

 

My thanks to all of you who provided hints and recommendations a while back that led to all of this over the last two days.



Jul 27, 2012 12:35AM
avatar

Yeah, I’m a Brucie, but having had internet linkage problems lately I haven’t yet read the article under discussion, so instead I’ll do what I do best, change the subject. I now present for your reading, or skipping (you choose) –

 

A VETERAN SEMI-POP MUSIC LISTENER’S REACTION TO FINALLY DIVING INTO GEORGE JONES, CHAPTER 1 or “[T]he man widely considered country music's greatest singer has been recorded and repackaged so endlessly you couldn't blame a newcomer for never beginning“ UNTIL NOW

 

I’m not really a newcomer of course, so the forgiveness is only partially appropriate. Back in our “Out Of Hand” days, my best local music buddy loaned me his vinyl of Alone Again, the top five of which ended up on my Gary Stewart, HWJr, Patsy Cline cassette I called Stoned at the Jukebox. I’d hate to tell you how many times “You want to sit in the car and listen to country music?” worked for me. Well, only twice, but I still hate to tell you.

 

And there was that unforgettable Fred and Elvis song, which I must have heard once on Austin City Limits or the like, and promptly downloaded into my permanent hard drive, even if it was the 80’s.

 

And nobody gets by without knowing “The Race Is On” or “He Stopped Loving Her”, and that he sang with Tammy and had a little drinking problem. But “The Battle”, “The Door”, “There’s The Door”, “Walls Can Fall“, “A Picture of Me (Without You)”, “These Days (I Barely Get By)”, the Hank Williams album,  and so on were nothing more than telling and intriguing titles until yesterday.  No excuses, other than the convenient forgiveness in the introductory Bobquote, and of course, the more common, There’s just too much music out there. (Please note, this is only Chapter 1. I’m only a few hours into this quest. Please also note that if a similar posting happens in the future on the subject of Tabu Ley Rochereau, don’t say I didn’t warn you.)

 

Punchline: I don’t think I’ll end up ranking him on my favorite artists list as high as Miles Davis, though the similarity in quality, longevity, iconicity, and prolific-icity makes Miles the artist he most reminds me of, but The Mekons, beloved as they are, may slip a notch. There just isn't very much that's this good, this easy.

 

Taking my clues from Bob, who, as above, frequently calls him country music’s greatest singer, I have focused mostly so far on the voice. (The lyrical material, as referenced by the titles above, is so archetypal as to need little comment other than to note that the archetype has to be real in order for it to be meaningful. Where it does inspire comment is when the songs are more than country music archetype and leave even the best of confessional singer-songwriters in the truly lived dust of a messy life. Which is also why I’m more naturally attracted to Bobby Pinson than to Brad Paisley, btw.)


to be continued . . .

Jul 26, 2012 11:32PM
avatar
The idea that Nora would be ostracized by overly reverent Bruce fans on a Christgau blog is funny. I see a couple of commenters on this site who lean that way, but despite my reaction to Ham's initial comment I haven't been that way for at least a quarter of a century, and Christgau's history of not thinking that Springsteen walks on water is well documented. I like Nora's assessment of Remnick's failures when it comes to writing about Springsteen's music, but that was obviously not what the article was about, so I easily ignored it. Where I think Nora and Ham trip up is separating Springsteen from the writers or fans. Remnick is not a great writer, and occasionally displays an apostle-like attitude toward his subject, but that is hardly Springsteen's fault (yeah, I know his schtick encourages this reaction, but every performer has his/her schtick). 
Jul 26, 2012 11:09PM
avatar
Glad that praise is being directed at my pieces, however accidentally.
Jul 26, 2012 9:55PM
avatar
Milo it's first draft stuff, by a beginner, so you're right, but most of my criticism was directed at Remnick: I didn't think he did a good job of making Bruce interesting, if you weren't in love already.  I think he could have made a better stab at it. I know that writing is hard, and if I was better at it I might have seemed to like him more. I hoped the 'River'  observation would show that I'm open.

I'm glad I didn't say anything about Joey's prose!
Jul 26, 2012 9:28PM
avatar
"which is lodged in perhaps an unreceptive environment here"

That's what she said! (How could I resist?)
Jul 26, 2012 9:22PM
avatar
Great writing tonight. (Except for this: "which is lodged in perhaps an unreceptive environment here")
Jul 26, 2012 9:18PM
avatar
"There's a whiff of reverence around Bruce . . ." A remark of Nora's  braver than perhaps even she knows.  Nor is Remnick's profile terribly helpful in making the "whiff" more intelligible. Remnick is not a rock critic, but gives an account of rock criticism and places Bruce in relationship to its founding rhetorical performances. Without wishing to undercut the courage of any of the rest of her response, which is lodged in perhaps an unreceptive environment here,  Reverence Bruce doesn't need, but he gets it at least partly legitimately, because his ethos has long been one of trying to honestly figure things out, and get them by his own rights right.  I listen to him even when, as lecturing at Austin at SXSW, what he says is a logical mess.  I take it as a given that the art of criticism forgives a critic's ambivalence when s/he says as clearly as possible what's making contradictory one's response.  My response to Bruce is ambivalent too.  When I was 22 I published a piece in THE RECORD critical of Bruce, and received a three-page abusive letter from the husband of the artist's personal assistant, basically running me out of the only paid-rock crit gig I ever had.  So I'm an amateur now, plenty ambivalent, which doesn't mean "fundamentally" against the artist.  Reverence suggests that contention will not be entertained.  The relation of Bruce and rock criticism -- there's something the matter there.  
Jul 26, 2012 9:16PM
avatar
<looks up recipe for "crispy critters">
Jul 26, 2012 8:13PM
avatar
"I tried to engage with the article because I like Bruce"

Boy, I'd hate to read your comments on somebody you disliked -- they would be some crispy critters. I get that you like James Brown. But when I count 10 negative reactions to four positive ones (and the negs are about far larger and more individual aspects), I conclude that basically, at bottom, in essence, however you wanna frame it, you don't like a performer. And I can't see how this --

"I can't make myself fascinated with his subject matter or much of his music"

doesn't conform with my conclusion.



"The other stuff is silly."

That's the idea.
Jul 26, 2012 7:49PM
avatar
Milo -- I tried to engage with the article because I like Bruce and I'm interested in him. I don't know what you mean by 'fundamentally.' I love your writing, but here It sounds like you mean 'uncritically.' The other stuff is silly.
Jul 26, 2012 7:36PM
avatar
Remember the "CCC Formulation" -- for Can Crusade Credibly.

 

"Only the poor and powerless can crusade credibly for the poor and powerless."

 

"Only those who wear leaves and live in mud puddles can crusade credibly for ecology activism."


I avoid reading articles about performers I don't like fundamentally. It's a waste of time.

Jul 26, 2012 7:23PM
avatar
Every time Coleman Hawkins comes up, I think of two of my favorite quotes ever: one is where the Gramophone Guide explains how he is "the root of all worthwhile saxophone playing"; the other is on the back of Affinity's 6-CD 1929-1941 box, from Sonny Rollins: "This about my master and idol. I should like to be sad now at his passing, but alas this thing is impossible for instead I find myself happy. Forever happy and grateful that he came." It's impossible to overstate either how important he is historically, or how much sheer pleasure he delivers. I play something or other by him virtually every day.

On another front, my computer overhaul is coming along nicely. New hardware worked like a charm. Ubuntu install was painless, until I logged in and was confronted with the world's stupidest window manager (something called Unity). Took me some time to figure out how to work in it (although the eventual plan is to replace it, probably with xfce), and how to get a lot of necessary non-default software installed. Got three websites running last night, and got the Christgau master site working tonight. Would be moving faster, but picked up a fever, which saps the will as well as the wits.


Jul 26, 2012 7:16PM
avatar
Liam I was wondering if you would reply to my trolling -- Andy Irvine/Paul Brady as greatest Irish folk album?! I think so. Andy Irvine is playing out here soon, in a small place in Sebastopol. Maybe I'll try to get Richard C. to go.

I must say, I did not enjoy the Springsteen article, though for different reasons than the writer below. Mainly, I thought it was boring. Another middle-aged writer flexing his paragraphs. But there were plenty of specifics that grated on me.

First off, I did not find the comparisons to James Brown apt, convincing, or even interesting. Is Bruce the hardest-working man in show-business? Maybe, or maybe not. Musically, he is not even close to James Brown, and the comparison requires more than just work-rate. This isn't just academic: a sample of one family here in Oakland (ours) finds that JB raises the excitement level at any time of day or evening, whereas Bruce often gets turned off as lugubrious, samey, or worse.

Second, I thought that Remnick's emphasis on Bruce's self-consciousness was clunky: so Bruce recognizes that he's a performer, part businessman, part carny, part preacher? Surely most performers learn this early doors. It might have been the starting point for his analysis, but not the conclusion.

I felt Remnick's hyperbole was not earned: I love music, I love music criticism, but I cringed when he called Landau's write-up of the Harvard Square Theater show, the  'most famous review in the history of rock criticism.' The dig at the Rolling Stones was dumb -- they are direct competitors with Bruce on the stadium circuit, and as far as I can tell they play about the same number of new songs and rarities each tour as he does. They are older, and like them or not, they also work hard to put on a show. May even be a better James Brown comparison.

There were other misjudgments or straw men, too. Noone else would have a sign saying, 'Thanks for making our lives better'? Sure, Lou Reed wouldn't get it -- but he's absolutely the wrong comparison. What about U2? I'd bet they get that stuff. Maybe even Coldplay, because once people see it on youtube, they'll do it.

Weirdly, because the article relied so much on biography to explain Bruce, the stuff that stuck out for me was the critical stuff from James Wolcott and Tom Carson, and nothing Remnick said really made a case against it: that there's a whiff of reverence around Bruce, a stink of sanctimony. Reading Patti and Bruce on their therapeutic enlightenment, I thought so too.
 
I've been listening to a lot of Bruce recently, after the Dean's write-up of his Roskilde concert. I enjoy him sometimes, but to my ear (and I felt this even more when I saw him from the cheap seats  in Oakland in 2002) he has a lot -- a *lot* -- of undistinguished mid tempo songs that sound rather similar to the uninitiated, and little musical distinction. I'm interested in his shtick, I love his love of music, and I'm interested in his ambition, but  I can't make myself fascinated with his subject matter or much of his music.

I know there are great things in there, though: on 'Live 75-85', his introduction to 'The River' is a model of storytelling, and I love the way he begins that story asking the crowd, 'How you doing out there tonight?' [Long burst of cheering], 'That's good.' [Long pause, more cheering] 'That's good.' The way he fits that with the end of the story, how his father responds to his failed physical ('it's nothing to applaud about'), is really wonderful. I just didn't get much of that from Mr. Remnick -- really just that he loves Bruce, and Bruce has still got it, and so, therefore, does he.

What the heck, I have to be honest, I might not have bothered writing this if I didn't still remember the weaselly way in which Remnick endorsed the Iraq war. Or the various second-rate hatchet jobs I've seen from him over the years, usually directed at easy targets. He's written a few good things about boxing maybe, but nah, this isn't much good.
Jul 26, 2012 7:07PM
avatar
Lefties who live well are called Champagne Socialists, or in England, Bollinger Bolsheviks, as if they should live in a hovel and not have a good time.  Me, I can't afford champagne, but cava's just fine...
Jul 26, 2012 6:30PM
avatar
"Nora and Cam used "Auld Triangle" but the Dubliners used "Old" on the LP I have.  I always think "Auld" sounds Scottish rather than Irish (as in "Auld Lang Syne") -"

Liam, Cam is short for Campbell (my grandmother's maiden name) so what do you expect?
Jul 26, 2012 5:53PM
avatar
Returning briefly to The Old Triangle, something I did not address in response to sharpsm's question is that the Royal Canal runs at the back (to the north) of Mountjoy Prison in Dublin.  There is a statue of Brendan Behan sitting on a bench along the canal, which matches the statue of Patrick Kavanagh on a bench along the Grand Canal in the south of the city.  I used to drop my daughter to a nearby day school, and we had a ritual of getting off the train, going to the canal and feeding the ducks and swans near Behan's statue, not far from the prison walls.

Re the spelling, Nora and Cam used "Auld Triangle" but the Dubliners used "Old" on the LP I have.  I always think "Auld" sounds Scottish rather than Irish (as in "Auld Lang Syne") - the traditional Irish phonetic spelling was "Ould" or "Oul' " (pronounced owld or owl).  The Pogues used "Auld" but most of them were born in England.  I checked the text of The Quare Fellow in a bookshop today, and while the title wasn't quoted anywhere I could see, Behan used "old" in the text.

Sadly, in the same bookshop I saw a copy of The Hostage where the ending was given away on the back.  I know the texts of plays are usually bought by people who perform them rather than read them for pleasure, but still..
Jul 26, 2012 5:37PM
avatar
For Richard and anyone else interested: absolutely amazing US whiskey night tonight at IWS,  I will post more detailed information tomorrow since I am lucky to be breathing, let alone sitting upright, but here's the list of what we sampled.  The Charbay distilled beers were the highlight.

Old Potrero Straight Rye
Old Potrero 18th c style rye
Leopold Bros Boubon
Breckenridge Bourbon
Charbay Distillery distilled IPA (Racer 5)
Charbay Distillery distilled stout (Big Bear Stout)
McCarthy's single malt second batch

and further research later in the evening:

Leopold Bros Rye
Pearse Lyons Malt whiskey (from Kentucky)
Leopold Bros Bourbon (different barrel to earlier sample)
Town Branch bourbon

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

about the blogger

Robert Christgau

Starting in 1967, Robert Christgau has covered popular music for The Village Voice, Esquire, Blender, Playboy, Rolling Stone, and many other publications. He teaches in New York University's Clive Davis Department of Recorded Music, maintains a comprehensive website at robertchristgau.com, and has published five books based on his journalism. He has written for MSN Music since 2006.

find concert tickets

 
Find more tickets. Powered by FanSnap