Robert Christgau's Music Criticism Blog - Expert Witness - MSN Music

Buck 65/M.I.A.

You-Know-What Like It or Not

By Xgau Mar 11, 2011 3:40AM

Buck 65: 20 Odd Years (WEA)

Beholden to nobody's scene or purist myths, the Halifax-spawned, Toronto-based, Paris-savvy cult rapper makes beats his way‑-drum tracks of course, this is hip-hop like it or not, but with whatever on top, which here comes down to mostly female collaborators whose sonics subsume their considerable verbal input. Plus on two standouts 65 goes it alone: the opening "Superstars Don't Love," which leads with a fearless three-syllable Jay-Z impression, and "Zombie Delight," putrefaction taffy finished off with the glorious couplet: "There's very little information and no answers./One weird thing is that they're excellent dancers!" He also covers the seminal Canadian rapper L. Cohen and finds a use for compatriot Gord Downie. Um, of the Tragically Hip? A MINUS

 

M.I.A.: Vicki Leekx Mixtape (vickileekx.com download)

The fact that this was overrated as part of the same extra-musical chain reaction that caused Maya to be underrated doesn't mean it was merely well-timed and, as they say, well-played. It takes a while to congeal, but for fans there's spice aplenty in the skinny beats-for-their-own-sake that dominate a first half whose most memorable line is "try to outschool us so we jump on our scooters" (on "WWW/Meds/Feds" seven minutes in, and FWIW the Wikipedia times are 40 seconds off on my version). And after "Vicki Intermission" come three consecutive songs that'll make you madder than you were already that the artiste thought it provocative, as they say, to leave the album untracked: the well-hooked "Gen -N-E-Y" followed by "Bad Girls" and "Marsha/Britney." Theme statement: "You can have my money but you can't have me." Whether she's singing it for her penniless sisters or her affluent self is impossible to tell. That's why they call her provocative. Also, um, controversial. B PLUS

381Comments
avatar

Maybe there are a lot of uncivil lurkers who dislike long posts?

 

Also, thumb-bombing requires less than zero effort and can be used as a way to express very mild annoyance, which in this context seems a lot more likely than vociferous hatred.

 

(I'm not one of the thumb-bombers, by the way)

Mar 15, 2011 3:03AM
avatar

Do allow me a moment of irrelevant personal expression now that the thread is over.

 

It looks like someone on this board "has it in for me", as they say. About the 5th time I've gone back over everything with wistful nostalgia (so much of the writing here demands revisiting) and noticed thumbs-downs conspicuously on my comments and that's it. Certainly not something to lose sleep over (and this is no exception; took an Advil PM and went to bed at 9), and in reality it's rather amusing in its harmless pettiness. But the reason I put stock in the thumbing mechanism, besides MSN's silly comment-classification function (controversial!! Ooh!), is because non-silly people are deigning to use it. As it stands, it transmogrifies what oughta be adult feelings within a collective as civil and deep as this one into a childish sniping game. And yet we remain civil, deep adults, so the fact that it's a conscious choice to click that f&ck-this-comment button can't help but bug me, because some civil, deep adult out there is deciding that they'd like to childishly snipe at someone.

 

I don't suspect there's any reverse-honor in it, either, like when Christgau's flamers utterly embarrass themselves, because I'm not Christgau; my reasoning has its flaws and my approach it inartfulnesses. I really do suspect somebody out there has a well-reasoned objection to me, and is choosing to take their feelings out in the least productive and mature way possible. Forgive me for wanting to know about it, but it cannot be 100% insane, unless there are a handful of silent madmen out there forming their own opinions as they read religiously. But if I put somebody off, I'd at least like the opportunity to find some means of honestly rectify it. You can call it tragic insecurity, and I can call it having a bigger heart than most strangers on the street. And of course a response like this could be easily accused of merely fanning who-gives-a-sh!t flames. But that's OK, because there's integrity here where there isn't on someone else's side.

 

When I say I'm not losing sleep over it I mean it, so from this point on I'll leave it alone. But I really would like to insist that if anybody out there is finding themselves becoming so irrationally irritated at the mere presence of a comment of mine that they're compelled to click on that thumb-bomb button on every one of my comments, talk it out with me instead. Take me to task for whatever it is I'm doing or have done that bothers you so much. Find me on Facebook, friend me, send me a message. Something that illustrates hope for the future of communication in this age where that's what we have every means of doing best. Because it's sort of a sh!tty thing to do to a fella for whom this forum has done its fair share of morale boosting. And I'm not ashamed to say any of that, coz it's true.

 

Now -- please, no need to respond with anything at all about how I shouldn't let it bug me, how it's ridiculous to get hung up on the thumb thing, or anything else at all. The discussion is less valuable to all when it deviates from music. But I know that all of us show up here so regularly because it also happens to be a party we enjoy attending more than perhaps most of those we make it to, though as some of us are in college I'm sure it's sometimes neck-and-neck. I'll get over it, probably within seconds of hitting "post". But though the bigger person might walk away, my philosophy is the biggest people are the ones that actually stick around and try to genuinely satisfy the as$holes. I give credit to the notion that nobody is an as$hole for no reason, even the ones that are certifiably crazy (like me for instance). And that's pretty f&ckin' nice of me.

 

End of rant! I love you all like talented stepchildren. And for the record, it would be pretty funny if this comment is suddenly bombarded with thumbs-downs. So I'll consider that an admirably witty compliment, should it come to pass. Hell, I'll be the first. Peace, &c.

Mar 15, 2011 1:33AM
avatar
God, I really need to give the Decemberists album a bit more of a try.  My friends love it and I only spun it twice.  Heard "Down By The Water" again, though, and found myself quite liking it.
Mar 15, 2011 1:25AM
avatar

That's a good rule. 

 

I'm going to go work on Joy Formidable, Decemberists, and the Rough Guide to African Guitar Legends, with a little of Bolano's The Skating Rink when I'm not taking notes.  I'm an insomniac, too. 

Mar 15, 2011 1:11AM
avatar
My rule is, a record gets four stars or the like from a critic I respect, I will try to listen to it once, if I can find it on Rhapsody or in my shelves. More than that--if I'm not tickled to begin with--only when a consensus builds. And when I'm teaching I'm not even that diligent.
Now I will post and make another pass at putting myself to sleep with Etta James's autobiography. Night night, I hope.


Mar 15, 2011 12:59AM
avatar

You know Bob, I thought your ****s were sh*ts...it took me a second to suss that one out. 

 

Rosen is quite good -- I enjoyed, for example, his contributions to the Music Club from a while back.  I certainly trust his byline more than Fricke's (who I don't care for) or even Will Hermes' (who I do like, though so far I don't care for that Joy Formidable record). 

 

I have no real prejudice against Britney Spears -- actually liked at least half of the last two records.  Haven't heard the new one yet, but I will before I go to sleep.  Still, "rave reviews" and "Britney Spears"...these are not exactly phrases you expect to see in the same sentence.  I would love to be proven wrong.  Surprises are nice, for sure.  I remember Erotica was a record that rearranged my world in more ways than one.

 

Buck 65: 20 Odd Years.  Forthcoming Loudon comp on Shout! Factory: 40 Odd Years.  A coincidence?

Mar 15, 2011 12:55AM
avatar
Not so hard, Joey--it's what we in the journalism used to call, in another medium, below the fold. Read to the bottom of the story before you start up with it.
Mar 15, 2011 12:48AM
avatar
Can't find the EW.  Might be the difference.
Mar 15, 2011 12:44AM
avatar
Me, I don't see what's wrong with the Britney story. Rolling Stone plus EW (especially since the Stone is Rosen not the oft-overenthusiastic Fricke), Max Martin plus Dr. Luke--that's enough for an item. And while I don't take RS grades that seriously either, that applies down as well as up--arguably not enough ****s and too many ***s and *** 1/2's (that was Blender's view of it). For sure there's no reason to think this one was hyped from above. Not exactly Wenner's stick of tea, Britney Spears.
Mar 15, 2011 12:37AM
avatar

I had a meaningless fling with four stars once. 

 

Oh, seriously.  I should really get back to writing.  I am so lazy...

Mar 15, 2011 12:33AM
avatar
Plus, they fling four stars in such a way that they're meaningless.
Mar 15, 2011 12:32AM
avatar

I suppose Joey, I forgot my own oft-said rule: Rolling Stone doesn't count.

Mar 15, 2011 12:27AM
avatar
Looking for the Britney high praise.  Everything I've seen has been just normally positive and not extravagantly so.  About what you might see a Gaga album get, and that's not too crazy.
Mar 15, 2011 12:17AM
avatar
The outro to that song was recently appropriated for a hip hop song...Cypress Hill, was it?  Whatever it was, I was not amused.
Mar 15, 2011 12:15AM
avatar
Although, oddly enough, speaking of CSN, as we were driving home today, she was flipping through the radio dial (or whatever it's called these days). She landed on the oldies station, which was playing the end of Suite: Judy Blue Eyes. She stopped there for a second, then pronounced "This isn't a radio station" and flipped back to the hip-hop station.
Mar 15, 2011 12:12AM
avatar

Thanks for filling in the context, but I was only kidding a bit.  You know, I'm a lonely island of good music taste in my family ("Or so he thinks") so I can only be jealous.  Maybe if I end up liking the new Britney record it will give my wife and me one more record that we can listen to together.  Sorry if my joke came off uptight...I mean, I'm totally uptight, but that's what all those years of therapy were for.

 

Perhaps I should cut off the irony while I'm ahead of myself.

Mar 15, 2011 12:00AM
avatar
Michael: I listen to what I want on the way there, when I'm alone; after she's in the car it's her choice, and we usually listen to the radio.  She does have Kanye's album on her iPod, but it's too embarrassing for us to listen to it together (she's sixteen).
Mar 14, 2011 11:53PM
avatar

Sharps -- you play Kanye West in front of your school-aged daughter?  Man, I had to suffer through Crosby, Stills, and Nash.  MBDTF is still my favorite non-reissue record of 2010 (with the Roots a few notches behind).

 

Toward my right, I see Britney's new record is getting rave reviews.  Not that I don't think that prospect is feasible...but from whom?

Mar 14, 2011 9:48PM
avatar
Jon Bon Jovi: Steve Jobs is personally responsible for killing the music business.

Well, I guess that's one more death in the Music News column. Two, if Jobs dies really soon.
Mar 14, 2011 9:41PM
avatar
Hey guys and gals-- Just catching up after a long day at work. A few quick comments. 

Let me second the love for Pharoah's Welcome to Love, which Tom himself turned me onto years ago.

RE: Blessed, put me in the love it camp there also. Maybe I'm listening to a different record than everyone else, but this is some serious Sister Lovers ****. Until she goes all Sonic Youth on us with Seeing Black. Lucinda, I've called in a Lexapro script for you at Walgreen's. 

Was listening to the 5 2-LP vinyl Bessie Smith reissues from back in the day on Columbia, which are some of my favorite big 12" records of all time with their lovely cover cartoons of the Empress in various poses-- definitely worth collecting just for the cover art. Pulled out the 2-CD Essential Bessie Smith which somehow I was sure Xgau recommended. Yet when I scan the database, I find Xgau has evidently never reviewed anything by Bessie Smith at all. A few shoutouts (some ambiguous, see Ma Rainey, others more affirmative, see Bonnie Raitt). So Bessie Smith gets my vote for the most substantial pop artist not duly catalogued by Xgau. (Not that there's anything wrong with that. . . .)


Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

about the blogger

Robert Christgau

Starting in 1967, Robert Christgau has covered popular music for The Village Voice, Esquire, Blender, Playboy, Rolling Stone, and many other publications. He teaches in New York University's Clive Davis Department of Recorded Music, maintains a comprehensive website at robertchristgau.com, and has published five books based on his journalism. He has written for MSN Music since 2006.

find concert tickets

 
Find more tickets. Powered by FanSnap