Robert Christgau's Music Criticism Blog - Expert Witness - MSN Music

I’m Your Man: The Life of Leonard Cohen

By Sylvie Simmons/HarperCollins/2012

By Xgau Dec 11, 2012 7:12AM
Leonard Cohen already had a biography, a pretty decent one by rockbook standards. Published in 1996, in the middle of a prolonged monastic retreat that appeared to put an end to the 62-year-old's public life, Vancouver English professor Ira B. Nadel's Various Positions is strong on Cohen's Jewish identification and poetic career if not so hip about the music that's why the book happened. But in I'm Your Man Sylvie Simmons blows Nadel away. Up there with such recent competition as RJ Smith on James Brown and Chris Salewicz on Bob Marley, she's constructed a hard-thinking music journalist's book where Nadel's is an openminded literary academic's. Having interviewed damn near everybody where Nadel did very little such digging, the San Francisco-based Brit isn't just much better than Nadel on Cohen's many music-biz enablers‑-she's better on his privileged youth in Jewish Montreal too.

 

Most important, she's infinitely better on what she‑-ponder that pronoun: she‑-has the common sense to make thematic from her title on out: women. G-d knows how many of the holy creatures Cohen has bedded in his 78 years‑-hundreds for sure, including Joni Mitchell and once Janis Joplin, unnamed seekers in that monastery, and briefly manager Kelley Lynch, who eventually robbed him of something like 10 million dollars, thus rousing him to a level of public activity and prestige few performing artists of 78 have ever achieved. Even Nadel mentions a few liaisons Simmons doesn't. But Simmons has gotten the details the major ones deserve: the saintly Marianne Ihlan of "So Long Marianne" fame; hot-headed Suzanne Elrod, the mother of his two children and his common-law wife for 10 years (the only one who seems bitter, although he's close to the kids, singer-songwriter Adam Cohen and Lorca Cohen, who has long lived downstairs in his Los Angeles duplex); distant Parisian photographer Dominique Isserman; May-December smart-beauty-with-a-dirty-mind Rebecca de Mornay; and his consort and collaborator for the first eight years of this century, Anjani Thomas.

 

OK, so we knew he's been quite the ladies man. But by soliciting the memories and insights of the Ihlan-Elrod-de Mornay-Thomas succession (Isserman didn't sit for an interview), Simmons portrays a man who was a remarkably intense serial monogamist no matter how much he got on the side‑-an adorer of women and a votary of beauty. No wonder, as Simmons reports, the fans at Cohen's European concerts in the '70s were three-quarters female. Yet she's equally diligent tracing Cohen's other non-artistic obsession: religious enlightenment. She details his devotion to the Jewish rituals passed down by his rabbi grandfather; fully describes the disciplines imposed by his now 105-year-old guru Roshi, who ordained him a Zen priest; devotes many pages to Cohen's substantial and decisive post-ordination studies with a Hindu teacher in Mumbai; and respects his early fascinations with Catholicism and Scientology as well.

 

These twin obsessions, one carnal and one spiritual, are source and content of Cohen's laboriously perfected, stubbornly prolific body of work, which Simmons doesn't neglect to analyze and appreciate. I'd say she overrates such works as Beautiful Losers, Death of a Ladies' Man, and Dear Heather. But that's a privilege she's earned. Though you'd never guess it from the awards showered on him‑-after all, he's touring at 78, and a Canadian citizen to boot‑-Cohen isn't Yeats or Lorca, and knowing the backstory of this lifelong depression fighter and belated superstar may not altogether allay your skepticism about his ultimate aesthetic import. But it will certainly induce you to understand where he's coming from, and why.

164Comments
Dec 13, 2012 11:03PM
avatar
McCartney's set (no, I will not let this go) had a rationale.  No "Hey Jude" style crowd pleasers, all rockers -- and he did it with three solo songs and two Beatles songs!  Plus, "Blackbird" because that was appropriate, and that new song that had his band rolling their eyes (got to advertise the new record, I guess), which was the only real oink.  As for Nirvana, I don't care if it wasn't a good song -- the whole thing cemented the Paul Rocks vibe, which I appreciated.  Bet when he found out they wanted him to be their Kurt, it meant a great deal to him -- especially since everyone seems to equate Kurt with John. 
Dec 13, 2012 9:16PM
avatar
Alfred, Auden said something similar about Houseman.

Of course, major poets fall into manner, too.  Wordsworth, anyone?



Dec 13, 2012 8:25PM
avatar
Milo IS right in this sense: Larkin's achievement is slight, and often fell into manner. He's a fabulous minor poet by these standards. A minor artist -- musician, poet -- by my lights masters a couple of moods and tones such that an audience wants this itch scratch whenever he's read or listened to -- but is never challenged or left to ponder an unsettling ambiguity. Spoon does this musically.

But so what?
Dec 13, 2012 8:24PM
avatar
And you people who know New York:

I am going to be in NYC (65th on the East Side) and have a dinner (presumably in the same area although I need to check) that begins at 6PM-- over at 8:30 or so I guess. How hard would it be to get to Maxwell's after dinner (via cab or otherwise) and what is the likelihood that there will be people scalping tickets for the sold out Yo La Tengo show? Is this a pipe-dream? I've seen YLT plenty, and will likely see them again when they tour their new (pretty great) record, but I've never been to Maxwell's and these shows always seem so special.
Dec 13, 2012 8:09PM
avatar
I've been trying to think of what to say about Cohen's music, and Brett's comment about Cohen's two voices got me off the fence. The Nick Cave's of the world who make Cohen their own personal Jesus befuddle me probably as much as our host, mostly because that's not what Cohen ever seems to have shot for. But that early Cohen voice-- it's what it sounds like when you are traveling through Europe and stumble into the company of another young person you communicate with poorly due to language barriers and red wine late at night. When you forget pitch and tempo and focus on the purrs and the hums, that's the juice that Cohen sells.

The older Cohen slows things down and rumbles more than he purrs or hums, so it becomes a sonic experience rather than an aphrodisiac. But what I love about Cohen's current era is the way he shines the light on that walk toward death. Graciously and gracefully. Neil Young is the more substantial artist and he's led an equally rich life, but he's not consciously creating an arc within his music that leads toward the end of his life as a destination-- NY is an Energizer bunny, even if I'm concerned about him a bit after reading his memoirs and watching his Jon Stewart sit-down. Joni Mitchell had a higher peak than Cohen but a lesser career, and is just a cranky old aunt now. The artists of the rock era, the ones who've survived, are only now walking into the terminal phases of their lives-- Leonard, let me introduce you to Mississippi John Hurt and Alberta Hunter, your new peers. 

And that's the joint.
Dec 13, 2012 7:56PM
avatar
Milo - chill. 

Speaking of P&J: are we anticipating Gangnam Style to take a top ten spot in the songs category? It's so popular it's a meme - and is probably the most watched music video of all time (we're nearing 1 billion views on YouTube, the next closest video of any kind claims just over 800 million). And on the basis of that, does the song deserve acclaim? I'm not sure it's a great song (though happily the message, who here understands Korean?, is one worthy of the Occupy movement) but what's the use in ignoring that king of cultural, like global cultural, impact? 
Dec 13, 2012 7:40PM
avatar
"I have enough trouble as it is with people misrepresenting what I've said."

Milo - I posted that quote at length for the benefit of those who hadn't read it, actually, not specifically for you. It's obvious this Larkin discussion isn't to your tastes, but plenty of others seem interested in the subject. And I would have thought that by going out of my way to note that...

"I know this point has already been addressed, and that Milo has also pointed out that this wasn't exactly the claim he was making"....

I was being careful not to put words in your mouth or misrepresent you. But I wasn't being careful enough, it seems. 
Dec 13, 2012 7:28PM
avatar

Right, your comment was so "unprovocative" that you toned it down with an edit after I posted my "much-more provocative" one.

Dec 13, 2012 7:18PM
avatar
"I'm really, really tired of this topic, so let me keep the discussion going by making a provocative comment..."

Nothing like a much-more provocative comment to complain about a "provocative" comment -- I had to respond to Jason G.'s post because not doing so would be to let stand a statement that would argue I didn't know enough about Larkin's positions to criticize them. Or worst of all that I hadn't even read *All What Jazz* but just read about it or some such.

And I really don't want to talk about this any more -- but you can't let some stuff just lie there. I have enough trouble as it is with people misrepresenting what I've said.
Dec 13, 2012 5:29PM
avatar
Duke, Larkin may be middlebrow. He may be the quintessential middlebrow poet, I don't know. But not Auden, my dear, not Auden.

Dec 13, 2012 5:26PM
avatar

"I'm really, really tired of this topic, so let me keep the discussion going by making a provocative comment..."

Dec 13, 2012 5:20PM
avatar
Marcus and Jon, another example of God turning things around: no CSN, no "Thrasher".
Dec 13, 2012 5:18PM
avatar
g-I consider them both basically middlebrow, really. Auden in particular seems, for all his technique, to be about as versatile or urgent as a slurpie in a corpse; many of the poems of his so many people seem to cherish strike me as rhetorically mawkish or spiritually null. Witty, though, witty. I admire, on the other hand, the immense emotional precision of Larkin, but reading him deeply makes of him a thing so mundane I'm half convinced the other books call him a muggle when my back's turned. He's neither as inventive, as adventurous, far-ranging, or varied, as I consider great poetry to be.
Also, while Jason's point is nice, I still consider him and his understatement to be basically the Englishman's plausible-deniability equivalent of histrionics, and he doesn't have anything like (for instance) Sylvia's power of metaphor or evolving stance.
Dec 13, 2012 5:15PM
avatar
Brett, I'm getting the feeling you're describing a certain demotic mode as "light", which is fine I suppose. But in the case of Auden especially, it's a misleading word.
Dec 13, 2012 5:06PM
avatar
"Rather, it's of a piece with his built-in suspicion of Modernism with a Capital M, as explicitly made clear in his intro to All What Jazz:"

I read that introduction. I'm really, really, tired of the topic, but I have to say that pretending all strains of modernism -- and it's not at all clear to me that bebop and beyond really is a type of "modernism"; painters in the '20s thought trad jazz was their soundtrack, after all -- have the same cultural impact and carry the same baggage is, to me, about the same as saying "some of my best friends are non-modernist black people." (And no, I'm not saying that anybody who disliked bebop and beyond had racial-stereotype problems. But I sure feel some people did.)


And I'd miss Pazz and Jop if it didn't keep missing me. I haven't gotten anything.
Dec 13, 2012 5:03PM
avatar
I have never read Larkin, and outside of this forum probably never will. That said, and pulling rank because I'm closer chronologically to death than just about anyone here, I thought the death poem Jason quoted quite good, especially as I've never found books or mind especially useful up against that particular challenge--drink either, since I'm not a drinker. although you will forgive typos as I've just had a bourbon with my person.
People, yes, although that's a tough one, since for me it does mostly mean person, and then one of you dies . . . .
On an altogether--well, mostly--different topic, I just got a PJ ballot. Haven't opened it yet, but presume we're on. I'm glad. I'd miss it.


Dec 13, 2012 4:45PM
avatar
gdash, your correction takes me back to the poem, with its lovely closing image of the psychopomp men of letters going with their lethe medication from house to house -- an apt image of Larkin's own fullest sense of himself (music critic included).  The poem needs no apology -- its fame will long outlast me.  Do I think it's a good poem?  I don't, but I readily admit I'm a limited reader of Larkin, and if there are those who take the dram, I say cheers.  "The sure extinction that we travel to | And shall be lost in always. . . " This gets at the lubricious ego-pet that marks for me the drunkard's sentiment; it's not anyways that all drunkard-poets put me off, either, just that this poem's assumption that to "not see" in its mordant lubricity marks one as "afraid" -- well, as it happens, I have other things to think through.  
Dec 13, 2012 4:36PM
avatar

My inexpert guess: Larkin wrote some very good poems indeed, and no one has done a certain kind of impacted-yet-somehow-light ("light" is not nec. a pejorative in my book) ruefulness better; but I think his work might be too on-the-nose to be considered great. Better and less-known postwar English-language poets: Douglas Crase, Alfred Corn, Carl Phillips, Amy Clampitt. 

Dec 13, 2012 4:21PM
avatar
Ham, Larkin's saying the realization of your own death rages out when you're caught without people or drink is part of why this is a great poem, and I get the feeling you're missing the point.

EDIT: Jason beat me to this, and said it better.
Dec 13, 2012 4:11PM
avatar
Re: Cohen's voice, I assume that Milo finds both of its versions a chore, though the later, smoke-ravaged one is what made me a fan. No way could younger LC have made the "Thank Gooddd, it's not that simple" on "In My Secret Life" so indelible.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

about the blogger

Robert Christgau

Starting in 1967, Robert Christgau has covered popular music for The Village Voice, Esquire, Blender, Playboy, Rolling Stone, and many other publications. He teaches in New York University's Clive Davis Department of Recorded Music, maintains a comprehensive website at robertchristgau.com, and has published five books based on his journalism. He has written for MSN Music since 2006.

find concert tickets

 
Find more tickets. Powered by FanSnap